Re: [LMMS-devel] Communication with ZynAddSubFX

2014-01-15 Thread Tobiasz KaroĊ„
I'm not a massive user of Massive, but it doesn't seem to be as capable as ZynAddSubFX in regard of sound complexity and layering or morphing. However ZASFX doesn't have such LFO/ENV routing capabilities. They are very different by design, and in fact I'd say that Zyn is the most "massive" synth I

Re: [LMMS-devel] Communication with ZynAddSubFX

2014-01-15 Thread Raine M. Ekman
Citerar Johannes Lorenz : > I think getting close to ableton is not the worst issue. Imo the > real problem is the lack of (linux native) synths. ZynAddSubFX is > still not as extended as NI Massive. But far worse for me is that it > is very difficult to interact between Zyn and LMMS: > >

[LMMS-devel] Communication with ZynAddSubFX

2014-01-15 Thread Johannes Lorenz
>From the thread "Vesa and Others": > I wonder if we could extend it to be something like ableton where you can mix > and produce all in one. I think getting close to ableton is not the worst issue. Imo the real problem is the lack of (linux native) synths. ZynAddSubFX is still not as extended a