Re: [logging] Log4J forward compatibility with version 1.3

2005-07-01 Thread Curt Arnold
On Jul 1, 2005, at 6:18 PM, Simon Kitching wrote: On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 16:13 -0700, Mark Womack wrote: This all seems sane to me. JCL will provide a way (eventually) to choose between the Log4j12Logger and the future Log4j13Logger? There is a request to add a method of determining the

RE: [logging] Log4J forward compatibility with version 1.3

2005-07-01 Thread Simon Kitching
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 16:13 -0700, Mark Womack wrote: > This all seems sane to me. JCL will provide a way (eventually) to choose > between the Log4j12Logger and the future Log4j13Logger? There is a request > to add a method of determining the log4j version which we will be > implementing for the

RE: [logging] Log4J forward compatibility with version 1.3

2005-07-01 Thread Mark Womack
This all seems sane to me. JCL will provide a way (eventually) to choose between the Log4j12Logger and the future Log4j13Logger? There is a request to add a method of determining the log4j version which we will be implementing for the 1.3 version. I'm sure that will help. -Mark > -Original

RE: [logging] Log4J forward compatibility with version 1.3

2005-07-01 Thread Simon Kitching
JCL 1.1 is likely to be released within the next 6 weeks or so (warning: crystal-ball-gazing prediction). So log4j 1.3 won't be out. And the general consensus is that we will *not* release code based on compiling against 1.3 alpha. Instead JCL will provide a Log4j12Logger class that specifically s

Re: cvs commit: logging-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/varia DenyAllFilter.java LevelMatchFilter.java LevelRangeFilter.java StringMatchFilter.java

2005-07-01 Thread Curt Arnold
On Jul 1, 2005, at 4:59 PM, Mark Womack wrote: If we are going to restore classes that have been previously removed, then we should mark them as deprecated in favor of the classes/features that are replacing them in v1.3. In this case I believe it is the new filtering expression language

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26433] - JMX problem org.apache.log4j.Level not serializable

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26433] - JMX problem org.apache.log4j.Level not serializable

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26433] - JMX problem org.apache.log4j.Level not serializable

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: cvs commit: logging-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/varia DenyAllFilter.java LevelMatchFilter.java LevelRangeFilter.java StringMatchFilter.java

2005-07-01 Thread Mark Womack
If we are going to restore classes that have been previously removed, then we should mark them as deprecated in favor of the classes/features that are replacing them in v1.3. In this case I believe it is the new filtering expression language(s)? -Mark > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29307] - log4cxx: locationInfo needs to include class/method

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34026] - SyslogAppender.append() does not check layout.ignoresThrowable()

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33682] - Bug in Pattern conversion

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: logging-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j TTCCLayout.java

2005-07-01 Thread carnold
carnold 2005/07/01 14:35:24 Modified:src/java/org/apache/log4j TTCCLayout.java Added: src/java/org/apache/log4j/helpers AbsoluteTimeDateFormat.java Log: Bug 35452: Restore o.a.l.helpers.AbsoluteTimeDateFormat and TTCCLayout(Timezone) Revision Ch

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30819] - Broken link to log4j.dtd

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30804] - Broken links, absence of samples

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29307] - log4cxx: locationInfo needs to include class/method

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29227] - Reduce first connection failure severity in SocketAppender

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27371] - java.lang.ThreadDeath caused by log4j when reloading Tomcat app

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27371] - java.lang.ThreadDeath caused by log4j when reloading Tomcat app

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23021] - Queue reading thread in AsyncAppender blocks if a called appender throws a RuntimeException

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19902] - PropertyConfigurator throws ExceptionInInitializerError Java 1.2.2 / Log4J 1.2.8

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18122] - The DOMConfiguration javadoc link to log4j.dtd is incorrect.

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17531] - PropertyConfigurator.configureAndWatch() don't reset the configuration

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17511] - Patch for Chainsaw to utilise Receiver framework

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: logging-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/varia DenyAllFilter.java LevelMatchFilter.java LevelRangeFilter.java StringMatchFilter.java

2005-07-01 Thread carnold
carnold 2005/07/01 13:56:00 Added: src/java/org/apache/log4j/varia DenyAllFilter.java LevelMatchFilter.java LevelRangeFilter.java StringMatchFilter.java Log: Bug 35452: Restore o.a.l.varia filter classes Revision ChangesPath

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17227] - Links for sample XMLs are inaccurate

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14551] - missing or displaced dtd for XMLayout class

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35452] - 1.3 alpha 7 not compatible with older versions of log4j i.e 1.2.8

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31056] - (PATCH) Console appender doesn't notice changes to System.out/System.err

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Starting 1.2.12 release effort

2005-07-01 Thread Mark Womack
+1. I don't want to hold off on patches that are simple and non-controversial. If anyone has a concern or question about a given patch, then please speak up after reviewing. -Mark > -Original Message- > From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 11:41 AM >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31056] - (PATCH) Console appender doesn't notice changes to System.out/System.err

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23705] - Parser get confused when using external entities.

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Starting 1.2.12 release effort

2005-07-01 Thread Curt Arnold
On Jul 1, 2005, at 12:43 PM, Mark Womack wrote: I think we should target 7/13 as the date to finalize the set of bugs to include in the 1.2.12 release. Fixes/patches would be applied soon after that (they can be applied sooner if no objections) with a release by the end of July. I see

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23705] - Parser get confused when using external entities.

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31056] - (PATCH) Console appender doesn't notice changes to System.out/System.err

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23705] - Parser get confused when using external entities.

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [logging] Log4J forward compatibility with version 1.3

2005-07-01 Thread Curt Arnold
On Jul 1, 2005, at 11:46 AM, Mark Womack wrote: [getting ready to duck rotten eggs and tomatoes...] What about just doing what the deprecation warning has been saying for all of the 1.2 release and getting rid of Category and Priority altogether in the 1.3 release? I think everyone has b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33827] - JNDIConnectionSource is broken

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31727] - Level WARN and INFO from a logfile will be recognized as DEBUG

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30838] - XML configuration files should not have thier values converted to Properties format

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26433] - JMX problem org.apache.log4j.Level not serializable

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26345] - Loader always uses ContextClassLoader for getting Ressources

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24159] - Log4J can create deadlock conditions

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23705] - Parser get confused when using external entities.

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31056] - (PATCH) Console appender doesn't notice changes to System.out/System.err

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17862] - Version.getVersion() method requested

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Starting 1.2.12 release effort

2005-07-01 Thread Mark Womack
I have started reviewing bugs in the log4j bug list for review and inclusion in the 1.2.12 release. I am marking promising candidates with the string "1.2.12 candidate" in the comments. If there is a bug you think should be considered for the 1.2.12 release, please mark accordingly. Any interest

SVN Migration?

2005-07-01 Thread Mark Womack
The Logging Services PMC voted earlier this year to have all of the subprojects converted to subversion by this July. We need someone to take on the conversion task for log4j. Any volunteers? Ceki, you previously mentioned that you had started the process. Where is it at? What needs to be comp

1.2.11 Release

2005-07-01 Thread Mark Womack
So, everyone should have seen the official release notice from Curt last week. My thanks to everyone for helping with the release, but especially to Curt and Yoav for picking up my slack there at the end as I went on vacation. I know the 1.2.11 release is kind of a tiny release, with just the JMS

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33624] - SocketHubAppender doesn't clean up socket

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35052] - Problem with String.intern() in CategoryKey

2005-07-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [logging] Log4J forward compatibility with version 1.3

2005-07-01 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, > What about just doing what the deprecation warning has been saying for all > of the 1.2 release and getting rid of Category and Priority altogether in > the 1.3 release? I think everyone has been fairly warned about it. I've been itching to do just that. +1. Yoav Shapira System Design an

RE: [logging] Log4J forward compatibility with version 1.3

2005-07-01 Thread Mark Womack
[getting ready to duck rotten eggs and tomatoes...] What about just doing what the deprecation warning has been saying for all of the 1.2 release and getting rid of Category and Priority altogether in the 1.3 release? I think everyone has been fairly warned about it. Simon, is there a pending re