DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48704] Multiple Java Process in Cluster Logging to the same log file and rotating the same log file

2010-02-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48704 --- Comment #3 from Ceki Gulcu c...@apache.org 2010-02-10 00:51:04 UTC --- Alternatively, you could use logback, log4j's successor, which supports having multiple JVMs writing to the same file. See prudent mode [1] for details. [1]

Re: Future development of Log4J?

2010-02-10 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hi all, I would like to bring up the old discussion on future Log4J development again. I think christmas killed it before there was an satisfying conclusion. I was basically asking if Log4J is dead or not; several opinions rose. There is logback as a stable project, implementing the meanwhile

Re: Future development of Log4J?

2010-02-10 Thread Ceki Gülcü
On 10/02/2010 6:12 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: Hi all, I would like to bring up the old discussion on future Log4J development again. I think christmas killed it before there was an satisfying conclusion. I was basically asking if Log4J is dead or not; several opinions rose. There is logback

Re: Future development of Log4J?

2010-02-10 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Another option would be to declare logback as the official successor to log4j, i.e. designate it as log4j 2.0. yes - that would be the most perfect solution i think. But are you willing to do bring the code back to apache? Cheers Christian Cheers, Christian -- Ceki

Re: Future development of Log4J?

2010-02-10 Thread Ceki Gülcü
On 10/02/2010 7:45 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: Another option would be to declare logback as the official successor to log4j, i.e. designate it as log4j 2.0. yes - that would be the most perfect solution i think. But are you willing to do bring the code back to apache? Sorry, I wasn't

RE: Future development of Log4J?

2010-02-10 Thread Gary Gregory
Since logback is licensed under EPL 1, does it matter who brings it to Apache? IOW, does the license allow for the code to be copied and repackaged as org.apache? Gary Gary Gregory ggreg...@apache.org ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com www.seagullsoftware.com -Original Message- From:

RE: Future development of Log4J?

2010-02-10 Thread Gary Gregory
Yes, I am interested in moving Log4J along to 2.0. Gary Gregory ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com ggreg...@apache.org www.seagullsoftware.com -Original Message- From: Christian Grobmeier [mailto:grobme...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 09:13 To: Log4J Developers List

Re: Future development of Log4J?

2010-02-10 Thread Ralph Goers
I am also interested in 2.0 (and already have commit rights), but have had very little time. Although Logback is superior to Log4j 1.x I do believe signficant improvements could still be made. In addition, I dislike immensely the benevolent dictatorship model if for no other reason than when