[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14026211#comment-14026211
]
Arthur Hsieh commented on LOG4J2-665:
-
Thanks Ralph, i've included in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Arthur Hsieh updated LOG4J2-665:
Attachment: log4j2.xml
My configuration file
Unable to connect from log4j2 Client GUI to my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Arthur Hsieh updated LOG4J2-665:
Attachment: Screen Shot 2014-06-10 at 15.42.33.png
Screen Shot 2014-06-10 at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14026211#comment-14026211
]
Arthur Hsieh edited comment on LOG4J2-665 at 6/10/14 7:50 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14026399#comment-14026399
]
sivan commented on LOG4J2-659:
--
We restarts our production servers after the patch deployment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Woonsan Ko closed LOG4J2-419.
-
Thank you so much for applying the patch!
Everything seems very fine.
Cheers,
Woonsan
Support default
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027015#comment-14027015
]
Gareth Western commented on LOG4J2-355:
---
[~btibi] Could you provide an example of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027015#comment-14027015
]
Gareth Western edited comment on LOG4J2-355 at 6/10/14 9:07 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027015#comment-14027015
]
Gareth Western edited comment on LOG4J2-355 at 6/10/14 9:10 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027015#comment-14027015
]
Gareth Western edited comment on LOG4J2-355 at 6/10/14 9:10 PM:
I am working on a new Appender and am noticing that the debug output is now far
less useful than it used to be. I used to see the factory method being invoked
with all of its parameters very nicely formatted. Now I see
2014-06-10 16:02:37,858 DEBUG No compatible method annotated with interface
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-42?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ralph Goers resolved LOG4J2-42.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0-rc2
Created ServletContextAppender in revision 1601789.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027205#comment-14027205
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-96:
---
Is there any further update on this issue?
Error
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
wrote:
I am working on a new Appender and am noticing that the debug output is
now far less useful than it used to be. I used to see the factory method
being invoked with all of its parameters very nicely formatted. Now I
Yes, good one! I was wondering about that just a couple of weeks ago!
Gary
-- Forwarded message --
From: rgo...@apache.org
Date: Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:19 PM
Subject: svn commit: r1601789 - in /logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk:
I think the discussion was not on its own thread. I thought there was
agreement that there should be only one way to configure plugins. I prefer the
factory method simply because it would be a whole lot of effort to convert
everything to a builder and I just don't think the benefit is worth
The way the web stuff is now this was very easy to implement vs how things were
when the issue was created.
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 10, 2014, at 4:31 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, good one! I was wondering about that just a couple of weeks ago!
Gary
--
Well, for Log4j Plugins, one way to configure should be plenty. I am OK
with the factory method pattern, while it makes for some long signatures, I
like that it is all in one place.
May I suggest a simple -1 reply on the ML on the changes to logging? Do
you feel a VETO is inappropriate here?
I don't know exactly what I would be vetoing. I have no problem with some of
the refactoring. The commit(s) that changed the logging probably happened weeks
ago and I am just noticing now.
But yes, I want the logging aspect of the changes reverted back to what was
previously being done.
Sent
Maybe Matt can shed a light on this?
Gary
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Ralph Goers rgo...@apache.org wrote:
I don't know exactly what I would be vetoing. I have no problem with some
of the refactoring. The commit(s) that changed the logging probably
happened weeks ago and I am just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027428#comment-14027428
]
Arthur Hsieh commented on LOG4J2-665:
-
I am now able to see the log4j2 tab when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ralph Goers closed LOG4J2-509.
--
Resolution: Not a Problem
Use of a date
Substitution for a {%i} index does not work properly when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ralph Goers reopened LOG4J2-509:
Substitution for a {%i} index does not work properly when date pattern is
contains seconds.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027430#comment-14027430
]
Ralph Goers edited comment on LOG4J2-509 at 6/11/14 5:31 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ralph Goers closed LOG4J2-509.
--
Resolution: Not a Problem
Substitution for a {%i} index does not work properly when date pattern is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ralph Goers updated LOG4J2-536:
---
Summary: Project Dependencies page has no content (was: Project Depencies
page has no content)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027439#comment-14027439
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-536:
They are not the same.
The log4j parent pom
27 matches
Mail list logo