[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-665) Unable to connect from log4j2 Client GUI to my application

2014-06-10 Thread Arthur Hsieh (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14026211#comment-14026211 ] Arthur Hsieh commented on LOG4J2-665: - Thanks Ralph, i've included in

[jira] [Updated] (LOG4J2-665) Unable to connect from log4j2 Client GUI to my application

2014-06-10 Thread Arthur Hsieh (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arthur Hsieh updated LOG4J2-665: Attachment: log4j2.xml My configuration file Unable to connect from log4j2 Client GUI to my

[jira] [Updated] (LOG4J2-665) Unable to connect from log4j2 Client GUI to my application

2014-06-10 Thread Arthur Hsieh (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arthur Hsieh updated LOG4J2-665: Attachment: Screen Shot 2014-06-10 at 15.42.33.png Screen Shot 2014-06-10 at

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LOG4J2-665) Unable to connect from log4j2 Client GUI to my application

2014-06-10 Thread Arthur Hsieh (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14026211#comment-14026211 ] Arthur Hsieh edited comment on LOG4J2-665 at 6/10/14 7:50 AM: --

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-659) Log files not properly rolled over to the folder.

2014-06-10 Thread sivan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14026399#comment-14026399 ] sivan commented on LOG4J2-659: -- We restarts our production servers after the patch deployment

[jira] [Closed] (LOG4J2-419) Support default value for missing key in look ups with fallbacking to looking in the properties map

2014-06-10 Thread Woonsan Ko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Woonsan Ko closed LOG4J2-419. - Thank you so much for applying the patch! Everything seems very fine. Cheers, Woonsan Support default

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-355) Add support for multiple SD-ELEMENTs in a RFC 5424 syslog message

2014-06-10 Thread Gareth Western (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027015#comment-14027015 ] Gareth Western commented on LOG4J2-355: --- [~btibi] Could you provide an example of

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LOG4J2-355) Add support for multiple SD-ELEMENTs in a RFC 5424 syslog message

2014-06-10 Thread Gareth Western (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027015#comment-14027015 ] Gareth Western edited comment on LOG4J2-355 at 6/10/14 9:07 PM:

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LOG4J2-355) Add support for multiple SD-ELEMENTs in a RFC 5424 syslog message

2014-06-10 Thread Gareth Western (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027015#comment-14027015 ] Gareth Western edited comment on LOG4J2-355 at 6/10/14 9:10 PM:

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LOG4J2-355) Add support for multiple SD-ELEMENTs in a RFC 5424 syslog message

2014-06-10 Thread Gareth Western (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027015#comment-14027015 ] Gareth Western edited comment on LOG4J2-355 at 6/10/14 9:10 PM:

debug output

2014-06-10 Thread Ralph Goers
I am working on a new Appender and am noticing that the debug output is now far less useful than it used to be. I used to see the factory method being invoked with all of its parameters very nicely formatted. Now I see 2014-06-10 16:02:37,858 DEBUG No compatible method annotated with interface

[jira] [Resolved] (LOG4J2-42) Improving log4j so it can easily be used with servlet logging

2014-06-10 Thread Ralph Goers (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-42?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ralph Goers resolved LOG4J2-42. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0-rc2 Created ServletContextAppender in revision 1601789.

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-96) Error with SocketServer

2014-06-10 Thread Ralph Goers (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027205#comment-14027205 ] Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-96: --- Is there any further update on this issue? Error

Re: debug output

2014-06-10 Thread Gary Gregory
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote: I am working on a new Appender and am noticing that the debug output is now far less useful than it used to be. I used to see the factory method being invoked with all of its parameters very nicely formatted. Now I

Fwd: svn commit: r1601789 - in /logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk: log4j-web/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/web/appender/ log4j-web/src/test/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/web/ log4j-web/src/test/reso

2014-06-10 Thread Gary Gregory
Yes, good one! I was wondering about that just a couple of weeks ago! Gary -- Forwarded message -- From: rgo...@apache.org Date: Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:19 PM Subject: svn commit: r1601789 - in /logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk:

Re: debug output

2014-06-10 Thread Ralph Goers
I think the discussion was not on its own thread. I thought there was agreement that there should be only one way to configure plugins. I prefer the factory method simply because it would be a whole lot of effort to convert everything to a builder and I just don't think the benefit is worth

Re: svn commit: r1601789 - in /logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk: log4j-web/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/web/appender/ log4j-web/src/test/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/web/ log4j-web/src/test/resou

2014-06-10 Thread Ralph Goers
The way the web stuff is now this was very easy to implement vs how things were when the issue was created. Sent from my iPad On Jun 10, 2014, at 4:31 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, good one! I was wondering about that just a couple of weeks ago! Gary --

Re: debug output

2014-06-10 Thread Gary Gregory
Well, for Log4j Plugins, one way to configure should be plenty. I am OK with the factory method pattern, while it makes for some long signatures, I like that it is all in one place. May I suggest a simple -1 reply on the ML on the changes to logging? Do you feel a VETO is inappropriate here?

Re: debug output

2014-06-10 Thread Ralph Goers
I don't know exactly what I would be vetoing. I have no problem with some of the refactoring. The commit(s) that changed the logging probably happened weeks ago and I am just noticing now. But yes, I want the logging aspect of the changes reverted back to what was previously being done. Sent

Re: debug output

2014-06-10 Thread Gary Gregory
Maybe Matt can shed a light on this? Gary On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Ralph Goers rgo...@apache.org wrote: I don't know exactly what I would be vetoing. I have no problem with some of the refactoring. The commit(s) that changed the logging probably happened weeks ago and I am just

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-665) Unable to connect from log4j2 Client GUI to my application

2014-06-10 Thread Arthur Hsieh (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027428#comment-14027428 ] Arthur Hsieh commented on LOG4J2-665: - I am now able to see the log4j2 tab when

[jira] [Closed] (LOG4J2-509) Substitution for a {%i} index does not work properly when date pattern is contains seconds.

2014-06-10 Thread Ralph Goers (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ralph Goers closed LOG4J2-509. -- Resolution: Not a Problem Use of a date Substitution for a {%i} index does not work properly when

[jira] [Reopened] (LOG4J2-509) Substitution for a {%i} index does not work properly when date pattern is contains seconds.

2014-06-10 Thread Ralph Goers (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ralph Goers reopened LOG4J2-509: Substitution for a {%i} index does not work properly when date pattern is contains seconds.

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LOG4J2-509) Substitution for a {%i} index does not work properly when date pattern is contains seconds.

2014-06-10 Thread Ralph Goers (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027430#comment-14027430 ] Ralph Goers edited comment on LOG4J2-509 at 6/11/14 5:31 AM: -

[jira] [Closed] (LOG4J2-509) Substitution for a {%i} index does not work properly when date pattern is contains seconds.

2014-06-10 Thread Ralph Goers (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ralph Goers closed LOG4J2-509. -- Resolution: Not a Problem Substitution for a {%i} index does not work properly when date pattern is

[jira] [Updated] (LOG4J2-536) Project Dependencies page has no content

2014-06-10 Thread Ralph Goers (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ralph Goers updated LOG4J2-536: --- Summary: Project Dependencies page has no content (was: Project Depencies page has no content)

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-536) Project Dependencies page has no content

2014-06-10 Thread Ralph Goers (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14027439#comment-14027439 ] Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-536: They are not the same. The log4j parent pom