[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15537916#comment-15537916
]
Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1192:
--
Hello Harry,
Are you available to provide a patch?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15537905#comment-15537905
]
Harry Bawls commented on LOG4J2-1192:
-
The implementation of this feature does not work. (or at least
> On 1 Oct 2016, at 13:05, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> I don’t cut a release branch. The Maven release plugin updates the pom
> versions, creates the release tag, and then changes the pom version to be a
> snapshot. It then essentially does a mvn deploy on the tag. The
I don’t cut a release branch. The Maven release plugin updates the pom
versions, creates the release tag, and then changes the pom version to be a
snapshot. It then essentially does a mvn deploy on the tag. The release plugin
typically performs a build against the snapshot to confirm the build
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Remko Popma wrote:
> Thanks!
>
Were you thinking of doing a release as an "exercise" to improve the
process? ;-)
Gary
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 1 Oct 2016, at 11:34, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> On Sep 30, 2016
Thanks!
Sent from my iPhone
> On 1 Oct 2016, at 11:34, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> On Sep 30, 2016 7:15 PM, "Remko Popma" wrote:
> >
> > Can anyone send a link to the release procedures?
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4j2ReleaseGuide
>
>
On Sep 30, 2016 7:15 PM, "Remko Popma" wrote:
>
> Can anyone send a link to the release procedures?
http://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4j2ReleaseGuide
Gary
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 1 Oct 2016, at 2:31, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>> I would have
Can anyone send a link to the release procedures?
Sent from my iPhone
> On 1 Oct 2016, at 2:31, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> I would have a “core” project and an “extras”, “extensions” or some other
> name. They are all already separate jars. I just want to split them
Sent from my iPhone
> On 1 Oct 2016, at 2:04, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> Actually, I just created LOG4J2-1627 for this and I specifically did bring
> Java 9 modules into the discussion because they should at least be considered
> along with the Java 8 profiles. Right
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15537567#comment-15537567
]
Matt Sicker commented on LOG4J2-1628:
-
Public repo for all apache project snapshots is here:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15537487#comment-15537487
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1628:
-
You can build with {{mvn -DskipTests clean install}}. That is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15537413#comment-15537413
]
Remko Popma edited comment on LOG4J2-1628 at 10/1/16 12:08 AM:
---
Mark, the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15537468#comment-15537468
]
Mark Bowman commented on LOG4J2-1628:
-
The core module of log4j2 master doesn't build for me.
Failed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15537432#comment-15537432
]
Mark Bowman commented on LOG4J2-1628:
-
Is their a public repo for nightly-build maven artifacts or do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15537413#comment-15537413
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1628:
-
Mark, the problem description of scrambled messages reminded
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15537384#comment-15537384
]
Mark Bowman commented on LOG4J2-1628:
-
Yes, the link is intranet. I'll try and get an answer on why
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15537373#comment-15537373
]
Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1628:
--
As an aside, could you describe in a separate ticket how
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15537325#comment-15537325
]
Mark Bowman commented on LOG4J2-1628:
-
{noformat}
package org.lcogt.commons.log;
import
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15537317#comment-15537317
]
Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1628:
--
Can do describe or post {{LCOGTLayout}} SVP?
> File locking
Mark Bowman created LOG4J2-1628:
---
Summary: File locking regression for Async FileAppender
Key: LOG4J2-1628
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1628
Project: Log4j 2
Issue Type:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Please wait to cut rc2, I am fixing a regression:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1620
>
Fixed.
This looks like it needs addressing:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1618
Gary
>
> Gary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15536624#comment-15536624
]
Gary Gregory edited comment on LOG4J2-1588 at 9/30/16 6:19 PM:
---
+1, this is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15536624#comment-15536624
]
Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1588:
--
+1, this is a _perfect_ use case for the
I would have a “core” project and an “extras”, “extensions” or some other name.
They are all already separate jars. I just want to split them out because they
don’t (or shouldn’t) change nearly as often as the core stuff - although we may
get to the point where core is pretty stable and we are
I think your opinion would change if you tried to do the release.
Ralph
> On Sep 30, 2016, at 10:05 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Right, hence this thread ;-) I am not hot about having multiple builds FYIW.
>
> Gary
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Matt Sicker
Oh, and FWIW, I have never really been interested in the uber jar. To me, the
bom is really all that is required for that.
Ralph
> On Sep 30, 2016, at 10:04 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> Actually, I just created LOG4J2-1627 for this and I specifically did bring
>
Increased modularity is the OSGi way, but it's also a hard thing to
convince people of. I've met many developers (notably Spring fanboys) that
are still in a monolithic classpath mindset of "why bother splitting this
up?"
Anyways, Ralph, are you proposing spinning out the non-core stuff into a
Right, hence this thread ;-) I am not hot about having multiple builds FYIW.
Gary
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> Oh wait, Ralph is talking about something else entirely.
>
> On 30 September 2016 at 11:58, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
>> I
Actually, I just created LOG4J2-1627 for this and I specifically did bring Java
9 modules into the discussion because they should at least be considered along
with the Java 8 profiles. Right now I am sure we have stuff that would create
problems with trying to run in compact profiles 1 and 2.
Oh wait, Ralph is talking about something else entirely.
On 30 September 2016 at 11:58, Matt Sicker wrote:
> I think log4j-nosql could be merged into log4j-core.
>
> On 30 September 2016 at 11:50, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>
>> Ralph recently mentions that
I think log4j-nosql could be merged into log4j-core.
On 30 September 2016 at 11:50, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Ralph recently mentions that he'd like some modules removed while Matt
> mentioned merging some back into Core.
>
> Shall we discuss this on the ML instead of Jira?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ralph Goers updated LOG4J2-1627:
Description:
The Log4j build has grown to the point that performing releases is very time
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15536451#comment-15536451
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-1626:
-
I created LOG4J2-1627. Moving things back into core is
Ralph Goers created LOG4J2-1627:
---
Summary: Move components from the Log4j 2 build into a separate
build.
Key: LOG4J2-1627
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1627
Project: Log4j 2
Ralph recently mentions that he'd like some modules removed while Matt
mentioned merging some back into Core.
Shall we discuss this on the ML instead of Jira?
I could also see doing an uber jar (mod the mutually exclusive jars) and
reorging the system with a smaller core (everything except
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15536417#comment-15536417
]
Matt Sicker commented on LOG4J2-1626:
-
Could you make a new issue to discuss which modules you'd like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15536094#comment-15536094
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-1588:
-
My 2 cents. I agree with Mikael. This is exactly what the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15535923#comment-15535923
]
Remko Popma edited comment on LOG4J2-1588 at 9/30/16 12:57 PM:
---
You should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15535923#comment-15535923
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1588:
-
You should be able to control the behavior with [this system
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15535875#comment-15535875
]
Mikael Ståldal commented on LOG4J2-1588:
Maybe you can use Thread Content Map (also known as MDC)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15535789#comment-15535789
]
Rainer Schnitker commented on LOG4J2-1588:
--
The log4j version 2.5 is also ok. Only affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15535783#comment-15535783
]
Rainer Schnitker edited comment on LOG4J2-1588 at 9/30/16 11:51 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15535783#comment-15535783
]
Rainer Schnitker commented on LOG4J2-1588:
--
This issure affects version 2.6.2.
Perhaps there are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15535753#comment-15535753
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-1626:
-
All releases are done on OS/X.
I will restate. I will veto
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15535452#comment-15535452
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1501:
-
[~garydgregory] in the [Appenders
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15535454#comment-15535454
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1504:
-
[~garydgregory] in the [Appenders
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15535382#comment-15535382
]
Mikael Ståldal commented on LOG4J2-1626:
I don't use Windows either.
> Port Windows Event Log
It's possible to write to the event log using .NET; e.g.
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/301279 ...
It's also possible to compile .NET on Linux ...
https://www.microsoft.com/net/core#ubuntu
So lack of Windows may (*) not be that much of a show-stopper.
(*) I say may, because I wonder if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15535243#comment-15535243
]
Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1626:
--
Maybe...
> Port Windows Event Log Appender from Log4j 1.2
>
49 matches
Mail list logo