Re: svn commit: r370726 - in /logging/log4j/trunk/tests/witness/watchdog: watchdog.FileWatchdog.test1.txt watchdog.FileWatchdog.test2.txt

2006-01-25 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 05:46 AM 1/25/2006, Mark Womack wrote: Do we want to add a log4j-all-${version}.jar that would contain all the class files which could be used as a replacement for log4j-1.2.x.jar? +1 We also need to update the HISTORY.txt. Looking at the state of the documentation for 1.3, there are

Re: svn commit: r370726 - in /logging/log4j/trunk/tests/witness/watchdog: watchdog.FileWatchdog.test1.txt watchdog.FileWatchdog.test2.txt

2006-01-25 Thread Mark Womack
Actually, looking at it closer than I did last night, the actual recommendations are still good. I was confusing it with the recent change in the relationship between Priority/Level. But the actual suggestions are good. Sorry. I still think this page or a page like it should be part of the

Re: svn commit: r370726 - in /logging/log4j/trunk/tests/witness/watchdog: watchdog.FileWatchdog.test1.txt watchdog.FileWatchdog.test2.txt

2006-01-24 Thread Mark Womack
: r370726 - in /logging/log4j/trunk/tests/witness/watchdog: watchdog.FileWatchdog.test1.txt watchdog.FileWatchdog.test2.txt I don't think this fixes the problem since I was seeing that sometimes the generated files contained DEBUG and other times it didn't. My Mac build will now fails with the new

Re: svn commit: r370726 - in /logging/log4j/trunk/tests/witness/watchdog: watchdog.FileWatchdog.test1.txt watchdog.FileWatchdog.test2.txt

2006-01-24 Thread Mark Womack
. thanks, -Mark - Original Message - From: Curt Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Log4J Developers List log4j-dev@logging.apache.org Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 8:46 PM Subject: Re: svn commit: r370726 - in /logging/log4j/trunk/tests/witness/watchdog: watchdog.FileWatchdog.test1.txt

Re: svn commit: r370726 - in /logging/log4j/trunk/tests/witness/watchdog: watchdog.FileWatchdog.test1.txt watchdog.FileWatchdog.test2.txt

2006-01-24 Thread Curt Arnold
On Jan 24, 2006, at 10:02 PM, Mark Womack wrote: Curt, before I re-enable the FileWatchdog test case, can you try it on your machine? I cleaned it up some, but looking at the code I'm not sure how it was still printing the debug message. It explicitly checks the level on the logger is

Re: svn commit: r370726 - in /logging/log4j/trunk/tests/witness/watchdog: watchdog.FileWatchdog.test1.txt watchdog.FileWatchdog.test2.txt

2006-01-24 Thread Mark Womack
On Jan 24, 2006, at 10:02 PM, Mark Womack wrote: Curt, before I re-enable the FileWatchdog test case, can you try it on your machine? I cleaned it up some, but looking at the code I'm not sure how it was still printing the debug message. It explicitly checks the level on the logger is

svn commit: r370726 - in /logging/log4j/trunk/tests/witness/watchdog: watchdog.FileWatchdog.test1.txt watchdog.FileWatchdog.test2.txt

2006-01-19 Thread mwomack
Author: mwomack Date: Thu Jan 19 20:18:47 2006 New Revision: 370726 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=370726view=rev Log: Restoring file watchdog witness files Modified: logging/log4j/trunk/tests/witness/watchdog/watchdog.FileWatchdog.test1.txt

Re: svn commit: r370726 - in /logging/log4j/trunk/tests/witness/watchdog: watchdog.FileWatchdog.test1.txt watchdog.FileWatchdog.test2.txt

2006-01-19 Thread Curt Arnold
I don't think this fixes the problem since I was seeing that sometimes the generated files contained DEBUG and other times it didn't. My Mac build will now fails with the new witness files since the generated files contain the DEBUG line. The previous Gump failures show inconsistent