[jira] [Created] (LOG4J2-1224) Log4j2 Rolling file appender not working

Kiran Kumar Vadla created LOG4J2-1224: - Summary: Log4j2 Rolling file appender not working Key: LOG4J2-1224 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1224 Project: Log4j 2 Issue Ty

Re: Log4j for Scala

My intention is to make a public release, which is easily accessible (binaries through Maven central), but mark it as preview somehow to be able to get some feedback before we commit to a final API. I would prefer if we could use the same group and artifact names as in the final, but include somet

[jira] [Closed] (LOG4J2-1220) Thread context value is different for same thread.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] sivan closed LOG4J2-1220. - Resolution: Fixed Thanks. > Thread context value is different for same thread. > ---

Re: Log4j for Scala

I'm pretty sure you can use different versions for different modules. We just keep the same version across the project. Making it 2.5-beta1 sounds fine to me. On 14 December 2015 at 03:00, Mikael Ståldal wrote: > My intention is to make a public release, which is easily accessible > (binaries th

Re: Log4j for Scala

I’d actually suggest using a version that has nothing to do with Log4j’s versioning at this point. For example 0.9 is a great way to let people know it isn’t GA. Ralph > On Dec 14, 2015, at 9:29 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > I'm pretty sure you can use different versions for different modules. W

Re: Log4j for Scala

Can it still depend on log4-api version 2.5 then? On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > I’d actually suggest using a version that has nothing to do with Log4j’s > versioning at this point. For example 0.9 is a great way to let people know > it isn’t GA. > > Ralph > > On Dec 14,

Re: Log4j for Scala

Sure. Ralph > On Dec 14, 2015, at 9:41 AM, Mikael Ståldal wrote: > > Can it still depend on log4-api version 2.5 then? > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Ralph Goers > wrote: > I’d actually suggest using a version that has nothing to do with Log4j’s >

Re: Log4j for Scala

Sounds good then. On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > Sure. > > Ralph > > On Dec 14, 2015, at 9:41 AM, Mikael Ståldal > wrote: > > Can it still depend on log4-api version 2.5 then? > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Ralph Goers > wrote: > >> I’d actually suggest using a v