To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project logging-log4j-receivers has an issue affecting its community
ok, I'll nuke component and receivers and pull the useful bits in to
chainsaw...does that mean we should remove the parent maven project then?
Scott
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Curt Arnold carn...@apache.org wrote:
Forget the packaging renaming bit. No need to make Chainsaw an OSGi package
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Scott Deboy scott.de...@gmail.com wrote:
ok, I'll nuke component and receivers and pull the useful bits in to
chainsaw...does that mean we should remove the parent maven project then?
If you speak of the parent for Companions: yes.
I think we can remove the
ok, moving ahead with removal then
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Scott Deboy scott.de...@gmail.com
wrote:
ok, I'll nuke component and receivers and pull the useful bits in to
chainsaw...does that mean we
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Scott Deboy scott.de...@gmail.com wrote:
ok, moving ahead with removal then
Thanks, and have fun - removing old stuff makes me always feel good,
hope it is the same feeling for you :-)
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
Definitely!
Anything to simplify things and get this out the door!
Thanks for all your help Christian,
Scott
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Scott Deboy scott.de...@gmail.com
wrote:
ok, moving ahead with
I need to use some of the classes that were copied to core from receivers in
1165491 (rewriteappender, utillogginglevel)...
Will there be a log4j release soon or should I duplicate these classes in
Chainsaw? I don't want a log4j release to hold up a Chainsaw release.
Scott
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Scott Deboy scott.de...@gmail.com wrote:
I need to use some of the classes that were copied to core from receivers in
1165491 (rewriteappender, utillogginglevel)...
Will there be a log4j release soon or should I duplicate these classes in
Chainsaw? I don't
I'm leaning toward keeping them in the same package location - when log4j is
released, I can remove the classes from Chainsaw and everything will still
work.
Scott
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Scott Deboy
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Scott Deboy scott.de...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm leaning toward keeping them in the same package location - when log4j is
released, I can remove the classes from Chainsaw and everything will still
work.
But you need to make a new release of chainsaw together with
I would need to make a new release of Chainsaw after the log4j release at
some point, assuming I needed other things from the updated version of
log4j, but right now Chainsaw depends on 1.2.16 and bundles it in the
standalone and DMG builds...so I think I'm ok.. (?)
Scott
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Scott Deboy scott.de...@gmail.com wrote:
I would need to make a new release of Chainsaw after the log4j release at
some point, assuming I needed other things from the updated version of
log4j, but right now Chainsaw depends on 1.2.16 and bundles it in the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45753
--- Comment #4 from Chad LaVigne chad_lavi...@yahoo.com 2011-09-30 18:40:29
UTC ---
I opened this issue quite a while ago and never received feedback after making
the changes initially requested. I've found this filter useful on quite a
13 matches
Mail list logo
