ok, moving ahead with removal then On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > ok, I'll nuke component and receivers and pull the useful bits in to > > chainsaw...does that mean we should remove the parent maven project then? > > If you speak of the parent for Companions: yes. > I think we can remove the whole Companions tree to the attic then > > Christian > > > > > Scott > > > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Curt Arnold <carn...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> Forget the packaging renaming bit. No need to make Chainsaw an OSGi > >> package and no need to add additional work. > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > >> > > > > > > > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > >
