On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com> wrote: > ok, moving ahead with removal then
Thanks, and have fun - removing old stuff makes me always feel good, hope it is the same feeling for you :-) > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > ok, I'll nuke component and receivers and pull the useful bits in to >> > chainsaw...does that mean we should remove the parent maven project >> > then? >> >> If you speak of the parent for Companions: yes. >> I think we can remove the whole Companions tree to the attic then >> >> Christian >> >> > >> > Scott >> > >> > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Curt Arnold <carn...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> Forget the packaging renaming bit. No need to make Chainsaw an OSGi >> >> package and no need to add additional work. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> http://www.grobmeier.de >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >> > > -- http://www.grobmeier.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
