On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> It didn't go to my spam folder. I just haven't had the time to really
> think about it and respond.
>
Same here. From my end, I'd like to take the time at some point to looking
into generating the XSD at the same time we scan for Plugins.
Ga
It didn't go to my spam folder. I just haven't had the time to really think
about it and respond.
Ralph
On Oct 22, 2013, at 1:11 AM, alexander.rat...@materna.de wrote:
> Hi,
> just checking if my previous mail went to spamfolder or something because I
> got no feedback yet.
>
> Best Regards,
On Wednesday, October 16, 2013, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Remko Popma
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Perfection may be hard to achieve, but if Alexander's suggestions are an
> > improvement over the current schema, should we add them to the current
> code
> > base?
> >
>
> Probab
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
> Perfection may be hard to achieve, but if Alexander's suggestions are an
> improvement over the current schema, should we add them to the current code
> base?
>
Probably but where are they? It looks like some text was lost in a reply to
this
Perfection may be hard to achieve, but if Alexander's suggestions are an
improvement over the current schema, should we add them to the current code
base?
Remko
On Tuesday, October 15, 2013, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Ralph Goers
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Oct 14, 2013, a
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
>
> On Oct 14, 2013, at 7:31 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> The current idea I have is that the XML Schema would reflect exactly
>> the code that is running. We should start with that. AFAIK, the
>> current code we have does not allow open-ended
On Oct 14, 2013, at 7:31 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> The current idea I have is that the XML Schema would reflect exactly
> the code that is running. We should start with that. AFAIK, the
> current code we have does not allow open-ended XML fragments, but I
> could be wrong...
>
> Gary
Of course
ht-
> Von: Gary Gregory [mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Montag, 14. Oktober 2013 16:18
> An: Log4J Users List
> Betreff: Re: Log4j2 Appender attributes with strict xml config
>
> Alexander ,
>
> XML validation against the XML Schema is not fully baked because the Log4
Alexander ,
XML validation against the XML Schema is not fully baked because the
Log4j 2 XML Schema is incomplete. Due to the current dynamic nature of
the configuration file (it's schema is tied to the Java code and the
annotations used), we need to generate the XML Schema based on these
annotati
