On 2015-11-08, Jeremiah Gowdy wrote:
> Sorry, I mean
> +1
yes is fine as well :-)
Thanks a lot
Stefan
Sorry, I mean
+1
> On Nov 7, 2015, at 8:32 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> log4net 1.2.14 RC2 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
>(revision 11058)
>
> Details of changes since 1.2.14 are
I vote yes.
> On Nov 7, 2015, at 8:32 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> log4net 1.2.14 RC2 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
>(revision 11058)
>
> Details of changes since 1.2.14 are in th
So what are you basing your vote on?
Gary
On Nov 7, 2015 11:00 AM, "Dominik Psenner" wrote:
> +1
>
> But i had and wont have the time to check and test the binaries.
> On 7 Nov 2015 5:32 p.m., "Stefan Bodewig" wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> log4net 1.2.14 RC2
+1
But i had and wont have the time to check and test the binaries.
On 7 Nov 2015 5:32 p.m., "Stefan Bodewig" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> log4net 1.2.14 RC2 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
> (revision 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
log4net 1.2.14 RC2 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
(revision 11058)
Details of changes since 1.2.14 are in the release notes:
http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release-n
