Re: [VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

+1 Note that generally a -1 is a veto only on code commits. On everything else it just means you are against the proposal. However, we generally strive for consensus so great weight is given to binding votes that are opposed. Ralph > On Mar 7, 2017, at 9:23 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > This is

[Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

g4j-dev@, log4php-dev@, log4net-dev@, log4cxx-dev@ -> > d...@logging.apache.org <mailto:d...@logging.apache.org> > Matt Sicker: +1 > Ralph Goers: +1 > Stefan Bodewig: +1 > Sven Rautenverg: -1 > Thorsten Schöning: -0 > Ivan Habunek: -0 > Dominik Psenner: +1 > Re

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

t doesn't cause any > issues currently. The main idea here is whether we should merge the dev lists > into one, or if we need a common dev list for all devs to subscribe to > (general@ doesn't sound appropriate, but I don't know what that list is for). > >

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

ll > of them need a larger audience. Just quoting the last few messages of two > user mailing lists I follow: > > log4j-user: the last topic came in a week ago, the topic before that about > two weeks ago > log4net-user: the last topic came in 24 hours ago and the topic before that a

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

er lists as > is. Shall we move forward with combining them now? > > On 10 March 2017 at 12:27, Dominik Psenner <mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Total agreement. > > On 10 Mar 2017 6:26 p.m., "Ralph Goers" <mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>> wr

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

to:boa...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Created a request, not sure if it's public: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/INFRA-13651 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/INFRA-13651> > > On 12 March 2017 at 17:11, Ralph

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

Is there any follow-up to this? Ralph > On Mar 12, 2017, at 9:30 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > 1. That seems fine to me. > 2. Is it possible to do both? I like the idea of annoying the sender but > still allowing the email to be sent. It would cool if it could even add > [

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

> On 16 March 2017 at 22:23, Matt Sicker <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Oh, I didn't realise I had a response on how to handle that. Let me follow up > with infra. > > On 16 March 2017 at 21:46, Ralph Goers <mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>>

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

Thanks Matt! Ralph > On Mar 21, 2017, at 10:15 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > No other opinions apparently. I suppose we'll go with the single list with > bounce messages. I'll follow up with infra later today. > > On 18 March 2017 at 13:12, Ralph Goers <ma

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

Matt, Any update on this? Ralph > On Mar 21, 2017, at 10:27 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Thanks Matt! > > Ralph > >> On Mar 21, 2017, at 10:15 AM, Matt Sicker > <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> No other opinions apparently. I suppo

Fwd: Slack Invites

I have created a logging channel on Slack for anyone who wants to use it. Ralph > Begin forwarded message: > > From: "John D. Ament" > Subject: Slack Invites > Date: March 29, 2017 at 6:54:53 AM MST > To: "gene...@incubator.apache.org" > Reply-To: gene...@incubator.apache.org > > All, > > B

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: log4net-trunk-build #84

You would have to contact Infra. Ralph > On Oct 9, 2015, at 7:58 AM, Dominik Psenner wrote: > > System.IO.IOException: There is not enough space on the disk. > > This surely is not good. :-( Who can we contact on this? > > On 2015-10-09 16:19, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: >> See

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1

The download cgi extension should be changed to lua. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 18, 2015, at 12:28 PM, Dominik Psenner wrote: > > The website has the following issues: > > * Sdk reference is a chm file, no longer a http website > * several pages have missing menu items in the project documen

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1

There was a security notice that was sent to all PMCs about a month ago. The cgi is no longer to be used. Ralph > On Oct 18, 2015, at 9:02 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> On 2015-10-18, Ralph Goers wrote: >> >> The download cgi extension should be changed to lua. >

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1

I apologize Stefan. I had every intention on reviewing the release but time just got away from me. I will look at the next one for sure. Ralph > On Nov 1, 2015, at 10:00 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > This vote has failed to attract enough votes but there is hope a new RC > will attract more

Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.14 based on RC2

Replying again to include Log4NET Dev +1 I tried to build one of the sample apps but they seem to require .Net 1.0 and .Net 4.0 only seems to go down to 2.0. So I really can’t verify that it runs. But all the packaging seems to be fine. Ralph > On Nov 10, 2015, at 4:50 AM, Stefan Bodewig wr

Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.15 Based on RC1

+1 I didn’t test but I did inspect all the artifacts, the web site and the rat report. Ralph > On Dec 5, 2015, at 10:29 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi > > with 1.2.14 we've introduced a serious regression inside the ADO.NET > appender -