All is not something you would log at, it's something to use as a threshold
for a logger that should log everything. Because it's lower than all your
message logging levels, they all get logged.
On 21 Oct 2016 11:25 am, "Nicholas Duane" wrote:
> Is Level.All correct? I looked at it in reflector
Nicholas,
The AdoNetAppender is *already* a buffering appender, with a default batch
size of (I think) 100 for performance reasons as you suggest (both for the
sake of your app and the poor database server).
Buffering does mean however that if your app tanks you probably lose the
log message that
Could someone please explain to some of the lurkers on these lists (like
myself) what the differences we are talking about actually are?
In the .net world the accusations against log4net have largely been around
the length of time to support new framework features properly (clr 2
lightweight locki
On 10 August 2011 23:38, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> This seems to be consensus by now by pretty much all Open Source
> projects in the .NET space. Just hand out your signing key so people
> can create their own patch builds - as they can do for any other
> platform as well. There is absolutely z
You need to make a logging call in the exe too (or at least define a logger,
as you say):
"It is necessary that the first call to LogManager.GetLogger made during the
process (or AppDomain) is made from the assembly that has the configuration
attributes"
http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/
On 08/02/06, Log4Net <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi,I have several services and an
ASP.NET application installed on the same machine.I want to use the rolling file appender and have each process log into its own set of files. ideally i would like to use one log4net configuration file to configure
It's not a bug per-se, but I think it's definitely worth putting
something up onto
http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/manual/contexts.html
regarding how ThreadContext and LogicalThreadContext are both
completely unsuitable for use within ASP.Net.
Otherwise naive developers (myself previousl
