Re: layout optional?

Log4j Appenders usually create a default layout if one is not configured. Gary On Nov 10, 2015 7:22 AM, "Nicholas Duane" wrote: > From reading the log4j2/log4net docs it appears adding a layout to an > appender is optional. If I don't add a layout to an appender how does the >

Re: layout optional?

0 November 2015 at 09:53, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Log4j Appenders usually create a default layout if one is not configured. > > > > Gary > > On Nov 10, 2015 7:22 AM, "Nicholas Duane" <nic...@msn.com> wrote: > >

Re: Why is log4net not more similar to log4j(2)?

I think I read somewhere that log4net was a port of log4j 1. "Patches welcome" is my motto :-) Gary On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote: > Sending to both the log4j and log4net mailing lists. > > I'm curious why log4net is not more similar to log4j(2)? Is it

Re: Why is log4net not more similar to log4j(2)?

Porting Log4j 2 would be a *huge* job. Would you use a translator of some kind? Gary On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote: > I was debating offering to help. Not that I wouldn't be interested, just > don't know how much time I could commit. Also, not sure I

Re: Why is log4net not more similar to log4j(2)?

It's not so much that one appender is more code than another. It's all the infrastructure underneath it all... Gary On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote: > Not sure. I was going to ask what a guess on the effort might be. I > wasn't expecting *huge*. And I

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Welcome Ralph Goers as the new Apache Logging Chair

Congratulations Ralph! Gary On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hello all, > > I was the chair of the Apache Logging Services project for 3 1/2 years. > Thank you, it was a great time. But it is time to move on. I think it is > critical for ASF