alex wrote:
I'd prefer to do it the other way round if you don't mind, and say you
have just one month to send a cheque for 50 pounds made out
to C A McLean [1] to state51, 8 rhoda street, bethnal green, e2 7ef ,
or brought along to the next social or technical meeting.
Hm, random question
* Paul Makepeace ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Building reliability is probably your best aim: does it have a UPS? does it
have a RAID 1/0 config? Dual PSUs? Tape drive backup policy? Those things
are way more important than a faster chip or RAM.
your right of course, however all of those
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 11:42:52PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
* Paul Makepeace ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Building reliability is probably your best aim: does it have a UPS? does it
have a RAID 1/0 config? Dual PSUs? Tape drive backup policy? Those things
are way more important than a
[1] My first name is actually Christopher, but handily my parents changed
[Oddly enough, same here. I'm Chris Paul ... It's an absolute pain in the
arse. Note to parents: don't do this.]
I know a Andrew Christopher Jackson that's known as Chris. So it's not
just Christopher that's
Dave Cross wrote:
I'm therefore looking for a volunteer to organise this. The organiser
would, of course, be given a free login on the server.
Anyone fancy it?
I'll give it a go.
At Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:12:58 +, Simon Wistow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Cross wrote:
I'm therefore looking for a volunteer to organise this. The
organiser would, of course, be given a free login on the server.
Anyone fancy it?
I'll give it a go.
Simon,
The advantage of
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
At Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:10:26 + (GMT), alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
Anyone fancy it?
I forgot to mention, I offered to do this before, and that offer still
stands.
Alex,
Thanks for the offer. I'm
Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
At Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:12:58 +, Simon Wistow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Cross wrote:
I'm therefore looking for a volunteer to organise this. The
organiser would, of course, be given a free login on the server.
What's the current specs of
A quick reminder of something I mentioned last night.
The hardware spec for penderel (our server) is starting to show its age
(I don't know exactly what the specs are, but the box is at least 18
months old).
There are also a number of people who have expressed an interest in
joining the
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
Thanks for the offer. I'm more that happy to take you up on it.
no problems.
How soon do you think you can have a list of the kinds of hardware
that you want to buy? That would give us an estimate of how many new
donors we're looking for.
I'd prefer
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
I'm not sure. I don't think I've ever known this. I'm hoping that
someone woh a) bought it or b) is sitting next to it will be able to
leap in with this information.
[alex@penderel alex]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id :
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
ok i was a bit late ;)
--
Snack pastries are dramatic when shapes are combined
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, you wrote:
[gem@penderel gem]$ cat /proc/meminfo
total:used:free: shared: buffers: cached:
Mem: 130895872 125063168 5832704 46772224 63795200 15314944
Swap: 271392768 6909952 264482816
MemTotal:127828 kB
if its of any intereset I was offered
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
* Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
At Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:34:11 +, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[upgrading penderel]
What's the current specs of the machine? (Just out of interest)
I'm not sure. I don't think I've ever known
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 02:41:57PM +, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
[gem@penderel gem]$ df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda6 3.9G 879M 2.8G 24% /
/dev/sda1 7.6M 2.9M 4.2M 41% /boot
OK that'll be another disk or two then - if
Personally I'd be happier if we had mirrored disks in there.
I'd go for a backup system before a mirror, myself.
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 02:37:24PM -, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
Personally I'd be happier if we had mirrored disks in there.
I'd go for a backup system before a mirror, myself.
That could be good, too...
We definately need one of the two. (IMHO)
Michael
Well a tape drive would be
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Stevens" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 January 2001 14:41
Subject: Re: Hardware Upgrade Fund
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 02:37:24PM -, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
Personally I'd be happier if we had mirrored disks in th
Who is planning to store data on penderel that they won't
have somewhere
else anyway. I don't think we should ever rely on our data
being there. I
have a local copy of everything that I have on other servers.
What about applications running on penderel that generate data? Even if what
they
Who is planning to store data on penderel that they won't
have somewhere
else anyway. I don't think we should ever rely on our data
being there. I
have a local copy of everything that I have on other servers.
So, we need only buy two more of whatever size disk we want in there, and
Title: RE: Hardware Upgrade Fund
I don't know about anyone else, but I'm quite happy to provide some money, but I'd much prefer to do a direct bank cash transfer (through online banking) I don't know if you'd want to publicise your bank acvcount details on the list, but if this is all going
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 02:42:19PM +, Neil Ford wrote:
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 02:37:24PM -, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
Personally I'd be happier if we had mirrored disks in there.
I'd go for a backup system before a mirror, myself.
That could be good, too...
We definately
From: "alex" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[1] My first name is actually Christopher, but handily my parents changed
their minds after registering my birth and decided to call me by my middle
name.
[Oddly enough, same here. I'm Chris Paul ... It's an absolute pain in the
arse. Note to parents: don't do
23 matches
Mail list logo
