So have you seen _Center of the World_ yet ?
YY
duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
see i dont mind 'lad's' magazines being covered in naked women,
because i mean thats kinda what makes up the content of the magazine.
but im very irritated by the fact that technology magazines are using
sex
Paul Mison [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth:
*On 29/05/2001 at 18:04 +0100, Yeoh Yiu wrote:
*So have you seen _Center of the World_ yet ?
*
*Nah, 'cos it's not out here yet. No release date is listed on IMDB.
*Salon didn't like it, though:
Salon has good taste too. Sucked harder than watching the queen
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 12:17:11PM +0100, Barbie wrote:
Bugger! Brain thinking faster than my hands!
Your hands *think*???
dha, sees a sci-fi movie in here somewhere...
that ones been done to death
--
Greg McCarroll
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 12:17:11PM +0100, Barbie wrote:
Bugger! Brain thinking faster than my hands!
Your hands *think*???
in fact, it was a recent Angel episode
--
Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:18:07AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 12:17:11PM +0100, Barbie wrote:
Bugger! Brain thinking faster than my hands!
Your hands *think*???
in fact, it was a recent Angel episode
Only
- Original Message -
From: Dave Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women
At 20:50 20/05/2001, Mike Jarvis wrote:
Sunday, May 20, 2001, 3:19:47 AM, Dave Cross wrote
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 05:26:51PM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
At 10:52 20/05/2001, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
I'm sure I'm really in the minority here, but I can't be the only one who
finds all this discussion of the FHM list distasteful. I've never
Robin Szemeti wrote:
I suspect the current 'Lad's' magazines phase is a backlash against the
crazy political correctness of the 80's .. hopefully the whole thing will
settle down eventually.
If you see it lying around the reading 'Getting away with it - the story
of Loaded' by Tim Southwell
From: robert shiels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to a recent survey, men say the first thing they notice about
a women are their eyes. And women say the first thing they notice about
men are: they're a bunch of liars.
That's not quite true. Women initial assume that all men are automatically
From: Barbie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 9:58 AM
From: robert shiels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to a recent survey, men say the first thing they notice about
a women are their eyes. And women say the first thing they notice about
men are: they're a bunch of liars.
Dave Cross:
And besides, since when could you work out how sexy a
woman (or man) was simply by looking at a photo.
Its in the eyes, Dave, its in the eyes.
See, I find it's in the personality. Which doesn't come
across too well in glossy magazine.
Hmmm. I wonder how you'd go about
I seem to recall some comic giving a rant to the effect of Used to be
just the magazines on the top shelf, everyone knew where they were,
everyone knew what they were for. Then these FHM, Loaded, etc though -
huh? What are they, for blokes who aren't sure if they want to
masturbate?
Not
On Mon, 21 May 2001, James Powell wrote:
So you don't fancy organizing a LPM Top 100 (well, maybe 25) then?
thinks .. err .. well theres ... ugh . and .. arr ... and we could
always get .. shudder/thinks
nope .. don't reckon that ones a winner. I know some Womens Institute in
Yorkshire made
At 11:06 21/05/01 +0100, you wrote:
Dave Cross:
See, I find it's in the personality. Which doesn't come
across too well in glossy magazine.
Hmmm. I wonder how you'd go about making personality pr0n?
Mills and Boon.
--
Jonathan Peterson
Technical Manager, Unified Ltd, 020 7383 6092
[EMAIL
See, I find it's in the personality. Which doesn't come
across too well in glossy magazine.
Hmmm. I wonder how you'd go about making personality pr0n?
Mills and Boon.
Well, no, I just had this conversation offlist. I'd say that personality
pr0n is an oxymoron. YMMV.
--
matt
so how
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 12:17:11PM +0100, Barbie wrote:
Bugger! Brain thinking faster than my hands!
Your hands *think*???
dha, sees a sci-fi movie in here somewhere...
--
David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved
At 00:06 20/05/2001, James Powell wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 12:00:38AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
Neil Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just picked up the latest FHM to check out the above mentioned list...
The interesting bits are as follows;
The really interesting bit was Mr
Dave Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm sure I'm really in the minority here, but I can't be the only
one who finds all this discussion of the FHM list distasteful. I've
never really understood why intelligent men find it acceptable to
objectify women in this way.
Just 'cause no one would
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
At 00:06 20/05/2001, James Powell wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 12:00:38AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
Neil Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just picked up the latest FHM to check out the above mentioned list...
The interesting bits are as
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
At 00:06 20/05/2001, James Powell wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 12:00:38AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
Neil Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just picked up the latest FHM to check out the above mentioned list...
The interesting bits are as
I suspect the current 'Lad's' magazines phase is a backlash against the
crazy political correctness of the 80's .. hopefully the whole thing will
settle down eventually.
[snip]
I do find it rather objectionable is
having them learing off the counter of every petrol station and
newsagent you go
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 10:47:43AM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote:
I suspect the current 'Lad's' magazines phase is a backlash against the
crazy political correctness of the 80's .. hopefully the whole thing will
settle down eventually. I don't particularly care that much about it. The
women in
At 10:52 20/05/2001, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
I'm sure I'm really in the minority here, but I can't be the only one who
finds all this discussion of the FHM list distasteful. I've never really
understood why intelligent men find it acceptable to
Dave Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 00:06 20/05/2001, James Powell wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 12:00:38AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
Neil Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just picked up the latest FHM to check out the above mentioned list...
The interesting bits are as
Sunday, May 20, 2001, 3:19:47 AM, Dave Cross wrote:
DC And besides, since when could you work out how sexy a woman (or man) was
DC simply by looking at a photo.
This is really two questions:
1) Can you tell from looking at a photo if this is someone you'd like
to have a relationship with?
At 20:50 20/05/2001, Mike Jarvis wrote:
Sunday, May 20, 2001, 3:19:47 AM, Dave Cross wrote:
DC And besides, since when could you work out how sexy a woman (or man) was
DC simply by looking at a photo.
This is really two questions:
1) Can you tell from looking at a photo if this is someone you'd
26 matches
Mail list logo
