We'll start at about 7pm and people will be practiving TPC and YAPC::E
talks.
I'll be there... btw, has anyone heard back from the YAPC::Europe peeps
about which papers have been accepted?... or have any idea when the
list will be published. [1]
Red
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know about you, but I'm *definitely* fat.
Big boned.
--
Dave Hodgkinson, http://www.hodgkinson.org
Editor-in-chief, The Highway Star http://www.deep-purple.com
Interim CTO, web server farms,
* Philip Newton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Greg McCarroll wrote on Freitag, 8. Juni 2001 11:11
And some pieces of software just wont be able to be plugged
in - why can't i run Samba on Windows?
Why would you want to?
* in a heterogeneous network i may want to standardise on a single
Dave Hodgkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know about you, but I'm *definitely* fat.
Big boned.
Nope.
--
Piers Cawley
www.iterative-software.com
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 03:13:19PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
here is the results from a partial mbox of ny.pm messages, it is not
that complete an mbox, but it does indicate that we are simply not
doing or best to take over NY.pm
You
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 07:23:32AM +, Redvers Davies wrote:
I'll be there... btw, has anyone heard back from the YAPC::Europe peeps
about which papers have been accepted?... or have any idea when the
list will be published. [1]
I had an e-mail from Ann Barcomb yesterday saying that my
Redvers Davies sent the following bits through the ether:
I'll be there... btw, has anyone heard back from the YAPC::Europe peeps
about which papers have been accepted?... or have any idea when the
list will be published. [1]
Speakers will be told Real Soon Now. Registration might happen
Remember the discussion some months ago about what a horrible book this
was?
Well, I've been exchanging emails with the author since slagging her off
big-time on Amazon. Somehow I've managed to make her thing that my input
is useful and I've just received a copy of the second edition of the
Dave Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Remember the discussion some months ago about what a horrible book this
was?
Well, I've been exchanging emails with the author since slagging her off
big-time on Amazon. Somehow I've managed to make her thing that my input
is useful and I've just
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 12:10:08PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Dave Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Remember the discussion some months ago about what a horrible book this
was?
Well, I've been exchanging emails with the author since slagging her off
big-time on
From: Jonathan Stowe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: www.gateway.gov.uk
As a public service I would exhort all of you to go to this site and then
complain when it tells you that you are using an 'Unsupported Browser'
(which I guess will be more than half of you :)
I agree that this is pants. I
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 01:54:01PM +0100, Robert Shiels wrote:
From: Jonathan Stowe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As a public service I would exhort all of you to go to this site and then
complain when it tells you that you are using an 'Unsupported Browser'
(which I guess will be more than half of
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 02:06:24PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
So yes, the only reason for not allowing me to use it is incompetence on
the part of whichever civil 'servants' were in charge of implementing it.
And nothing to do with the deal struck between Microsoft and the government.
No.
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 02:09:23PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 02:06:24PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
So yes, the only reason for not allowing me to use it is incompetence on
the part of whichever civil 'servants' were in charge of implementing it.
And nothing to
On Sat, 09 Jun 2001, Robert Shiels wrote:
From: Jonathan Stowe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: www.gateway.gov.uk
As a public service I would exhort all of you to go to this site and then
complain when it tells you that you are using an 'Unsupported Browser'
(which I guess will be more
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 02:26:40PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
I tend not to pay much attention to conspiracy theories.
Me neither.
http://linuxtoday.com/imgs/microsoft/gateway-microsoft-rationale-statement.pdf
--
This process can check if this value is zero, and if it is, it does
something
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 02:10:38PM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote:
I complained to the UK Online helpdesk .. they deny all responsiblity
for the thing .. but can give you helpdesk contacts for the 3 government
agencies contained within the 'government gateway' site .. of course they
deny all
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 05:46:33PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
o The Doggetts Coat and Arms (by the river)
It has to be said, Doggetts is a fine, fine pub. Plenty of room,
not-too-loud music, nice beer... and fairly convenient for most people.
Alex
--
Four pints of milk, a turkey baster and
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 02:59:48PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
Are these e-mail addresses? If so, does it make it possible to forward all
4 denials in 1 message To: all four and ask for one joined up government
answer?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/19340.html says the man to talk to
On Sat, 09 Jun 2001, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 02:10:38PM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote:
I complained to the UK Online helpdesk .. they deny all responsiblity
for the thing .. but can give you helpdesk contacts for the 3 government
agencies contained within the
Anyone got a link to this?
Ta,
Dave
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 09:56:20AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
Dave Hodgkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know about you, but I'm *definitely* fat.
Big boned.
Nope.
BBH, Big Beautiful Hacker?
Paul
--
Abandon normal instruments
On Sat, 9 Jun 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 02:59:48PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
Are these e-mail addresses? If so, does it make it possible to forward all
4 denials in 1 message To: all four and ask for one joined up government
answer?
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 10:03:29AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
You know, I've been meaning to ask...
Why in the world would you *want* to take over NY.pm???
Because you've lost your way, there was a time that no one would ever
have to
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Philip Newton wrote:
Paul Makepeace wrote on Donnerstag, 7. Juni 2001 13:27:
Greg McCarroll: 1546
**
Dave Cross: 762
Jonathan Stowe: 729 ***
Jonathan Stowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well based on another totally unscientific sample you did :)
And how about a signal/noise bias? ;-)
--
Dave Hodgkinson, http://www.hodgkinson.org
Editor-in-chief, The Highway Star http://www.deep-purple.com
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 09:10:53PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
And how about a signal/noise bias? ;-)
The noise *is* signal.
--
I cannot and will not cut my conscience to fit this year's fashions.
-- Lillian Hellman
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 09:57:52PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 09:10:53PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
And how about a signal/noise bias? ;-)
The noise *is* signal.
I'll have what he's drinking.
--
Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 09:57:52PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 09:10:53PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
And how about a signal/noise bias? ;-)
The noise *is* signal.
It's signal, Jim, but not as we know it.
Paul
--
Destroy nothing; Destroy the most important thing
29 matches
Mail list logo
