From: "Jonathan Stowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have a supsicion that SCO's 'VisionFS' is the same deal - or rather it
> is a re-engineering of SMB or CIFS or whatever they want to call it ...
If it's a re-engineering they did a pretty poor job. Another company I
worked for had headache after hea
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Chris Benson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 02:26:54PM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote:
> >
> > Hah! If I can't get them to use GPG, I have _no_ chance with Samba. The Unix
> > box in question is running AIX.
>
> *Cough* several IBM people I've spoken to believe that IBM'
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 02:26:54PM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote:
>
> Hah! If I can't get them to use GPG, I have _no_ chance with Samba. The Unix
> box in question is running AIX.
*Cough* several IBM people I've spoken to believe that IBM's
FastConnect(tm) "PC integration software for AIX"
Bull have a web site with ready compiled samba binaries for AIX - just say
it comes from an AIX manufacturer...
-Original Message-
From: dcross - David Cross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 April 2001 14:27
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: (Don't Laugh) Buying
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 05:12:57PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
> Can't you call it an "Enterprise cross-platform file sharing solution" or
> something like that?
So is Napster.
--
DEC diagnostics would run on a dead whale.
-- Mel Ferentz
dcross - David Cross wrote:
> Hah! If I can't get them to use GPG, I have _no_ chance with
> Samba.
Why? Because it's open software (or whatever they call themselves)?
Can't you call it an "Enterprise cross-platform file sharing solution" or
something like that? And get a company to support it?
dcross - David Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> PGP isn't free for commerical use. You're supposed to buy a license.
> When our purchasing department here approached NAI to buy one, they
> were told the the Unix (server) version was £27,000 and the Windows
> version was £657.
Stick it on a Wi
From: Rob Partington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 2:22 PM
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 02:03:33PM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote:
> > Obviously, from the bottom line this is a bit of a no-brainer. But this
> > leaves us having to copy files over to a PC, unencrypt them, and
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, you wrote:
> PGP isn't free for commerical use. You're supposed to buy a license. When
> our purchasing department here approached NAI to buy one, they were told the
> the Unix (server) version was £27,000 and the Windows version was £657.
>
> Obviously, from the bottom line
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 02:03:33PM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote:
> Obviously, from the bottom line this is a bit of a no-brainer. But this
> leaves us having to copy files over to a PC, unencrypt them, and copy them
> back to the Unix machine. Which I'd like to avoid.
Wouldn't be so bad if y
PGP isn't free for commerical use. You're supposed to buy a license. When
our purchasing department here approached NAI to buy one, they were told the
the Unix (server) version was £27,000 and the Windows version was £657.
Obviously, from the bottom line this is a bit of a no-brainer. But this
l
11 matches
Mail list logo
