this is the final test
--
Greg McCarrollhttp://217.34.97.146/~gem/
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
this is the final test
No wonder you're number 1 in the posting league.
L.
I've got a touch of the singles. Shingles? No, singles.
Since I've changed my mail setup I've had a bit of a problem with resending
the bounced mails - hopefully this will prove that I fixed it :)
You shouldnt be seeing any spurious [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: headers in this
...
/J\
--
Jonathan Stowe
Analyst/Programmer
Netscalibur UK
Tel: 0870 887
just a test
--
Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net
Greg McCarroll wrote:
just a test
Sorry, didn't arrive in Germany. You have some kind of UK only filter on
these things?
Please sent it again, with the filter turned off.
Cheers,
Philip (feeling testy)
--
Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 03:57:08PM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:40:03PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
Anyway, tip-o-the-day for mutt users. How to get HTML viewed easily and
automatically. I'm not 100% sure of the security aspects, but it's
still better than
pe -remote 'openURL(%s)'; test=RunningNetscape
# Else use lynx to view it as text
text/html; lynx -dump %s; copiousoutput
text/*; cat %s ; copiousoutput
application/msword; catdoc; copiousoutput
application/postscript; ps2ascii %s; copiousoutput
And loads more for images and stuff. Especia
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Merijn Broeren wrote:
# Else use lynx to view it as text
text/html; lynx -dump %s; copiousoutput
Quick question for us non mutt users that may one day consider using
it. Does this run throgh the shell? And what's %s in this? I'm kinda
hoping it's not able to be '; rm
Simon Cozens wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 09:19:15PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
Feature request - IMAP client.
Mail::IMAPClient exists, so I guess it's a real possibility. When I get a
spare second. (Yeah, right.)
There's also Mail::Cclient (by Malcolm Beattie) which can be
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:41:56AM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
There's also Mail::Cclient (by Malcolm Beattie) which can be tricky to
install and the interface is a bit unfriendly
That's the fault of the underlying Cclient library. :(
--
Sendmail may be safely run set-user-id to root.
Simon Cozens wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:41:56AM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
There's also Mail::Cclient (by Malcolm Beattie) which can be tricky to
install and the interface is a bit unfriendly
That's the fault of the underlying Cclient library. :(
Yeah, tell me about it.
hence
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:40:03PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
Anyway, tip-o-the-day for mutt users. How to get HTML viewed easily and
automatically. I'm not 100% sure of the security aspects, but it's
still better than Lookout. ;-)
[ ~/.mailcap
Title: Test
Sorry all - this is a test... :¬P
Bloomin' Outlook HTML ... *grumble*
Darren
Newbie Loser
Clarke, Darren wrote:
Bloomin' Outlook HTML ... *grumble*
I agree. Your mail server lost again.
Cheers,
Philip
--
Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:25:50PM +0100, Clarke, Darren wrote:
Sorry all - this is a test... :P
Bloomin' Outlook HTML ... *grumble*
Darren
Newbie Loser
You don't get away from a Newbie without learning though.
Anyway, tip-o-the-day for mutt users. How to get HTML
BDY.RTF
Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
notify the sender immediately by
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:25:50PM +0100, Clarke, Darren wrote:
Sorry all - this is a test... :P
Bloomin' Outlook HTML ... *grumble*
It's coming through as multipart/alternative, which is fine IMO.
People with broken mail clients may disagree :-)
.robin.
--
select replace(a, CHR(88
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft
Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text.
thats perfect as far as i'm concerned (mutt user)
--
Greg McCarroll http
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:42:31PM +0100, Robin Houston wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:25:50PM +0100, Clarke, Darren wrote:
Sorry all - this is a test... :P
Bloomin' Outlook HTML ... *grumble*
It's coming through as multipart/alternative, which is fine IMO.
People with broken mail
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 2:41 PM
Subject: Test from uuencode boy
test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft
Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text.
Snip
On Wed, 04 Apr 2001, you wrote:
test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft
Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text.
works for me .. theres stuff I dont need, but since it identifies whats
what in the headers I can read it fine
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
[...] the HTML hanger on serves no purpose except to consume
my disk space at 4 times the rate.
You mean you *archive* this bollocks?
:-)
.robin. (reads london-pm with the 'D' key)
--
Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas!
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 04:15:21PM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent the following bits through the ether:
test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft
Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text.
Okay, you have a 17
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft
Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text.
Your message looks like this :
I 1 no description [multipa/alternativ, 7bit
* at 04/04 15:58 +0100 Robin Houston said:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
[...] the HTML hanger on serves no purpose except to consume
my disk space at 4 times the rate.
You mean you *archive* this bollocks?
doesn't eveyone archive all their mail? *some*
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft
Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text.
Sort of - pine seems to prefer the disclaimer over the body of the message
as an alternative part but I have
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Struan Donald wrote:
* at 04/04 15:58 +0100 Robin Houston said:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
[...] the HTML hanger on serves no purpose except to consume
my disk space at 4 times the rate.
You mean you *archive* this bollocks?
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 04:30:53PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
However, it's more all these *** job agencies sending me things
in multi-crap that I'm shifting home over a modem to read at home.
scp -C is good at making things smaller, but
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 09:19:15PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
Feature request - IMAP client.
Mail::IMAPClient exists, so I guess it's a real possibility. When I get a
spare second. (Yeah, right.)
--
We *have* dirty minds. This is not news.
- Kake Pugh
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:40:03PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
Anyway, tip-o-the-day for mutt users. How to get HTML viewed easily and
automatically.
Don't bother. If it was worth saying, it was worth saying properly.
--
David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Hi.
I have an (as yet unreleased) module called Mail::ListDetector,
which takes a Mail::Internet object, and attempts to tell you if the
message involved was posted to a mailing list, and if so, attempts to
get some details about that list.
I need testers - in particular, see if it builds and
31 matches
Mail list logo
