Re: Caller ID (was Re: Enough!)

2001-05-16 Thread Chris Benson
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 11:15:52AM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:59:07AM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote: > > I do keep intending to do something cute with my ISDN adapter and log the > > stuff coming out of the D channel and see whats in there ... but time has > > prevent

Re: Caller ID (was Re: Enough!)

2001-05-16 Thread Philip Newton
Steve Mynott wrote: > I have heard of people using the D channel signalling to communicate > for free. I've also heard of phone companies cursing such users and trying to ban programs that support that. At least in Germany, there was a program (or several?) that took advantage of the fact that w

Re: Caller ID (was Re: Enough!)

2001-05-16 Thread Steve Mynott
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 16 May 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:59:07AM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote: > > > I do keep intending to do something cute with my ISDN adapter and log the > > > stuff coming out of the D channel and see whats

Re: Caller ID (was Re: Enough!)

2001-05-16 Thread Robin Szemeti
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:59:07AM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote: > > I do keep intending to do something cute with my ISDN adapter and log the > > stuff coming out of the D channel and see whats in there ... but time has > > prevented it etc. > > I'd b

Re: Caller ID (was Re: Enough!)

2001-05-16 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:59:07AM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote: > > I do keep intending to do something cute with my ISDN adapter and log the > > stuff coming out of the D channel and see whats in there ... but time has > > prevented it etc. > I'd be i

Re: Caller ID (was Re: Enough!)

2001-05-16 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:59:07AM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote: > I do keep intending to do something cute with my ISDN adapter and log the > stuff coming out of the D channel and see whats in there ... but time has > prevented it etc. I'd be interested to hear how you get on... I was under the im

Re: Caller ID (was Re: Enough!)

2001-05-16 Thread Robin Szemeti
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Jonathan Peterson wrote: > At 21:08 15/05/01 +0100, you wrote: > > >They already offer it. > >You can bar up to ten numbers (IIRC). I don't know how it deals > >with withheld numbers. Never checked. > > I'm sure I remember reading somewhere that you always send your CID when

Re: Caller ID (was Re: Enough!)

2001-05-16 Thread Steve Mynott
"Jonathan Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm sure I remember reading somewhere that you always send your CID when > > you make a phone call. If you choose to withhold the ID, it still gets > > sent, it just gets sent with a 'do not disclose' flag set, which all (BT > > approved)

Re: Caller ID (was Re: Enough!)

2001-05-16 Thread Steve Mynott
"Jonathan Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm sure I remember reading somewhere that you always send your CID when > you make a phone call. If you choose to withhold the ID, it still gets > sent, it just gets sent with a 'do not disclose' flag set, which all (BT > approved) phones and

Caller ID (was Re: Enough!)

2001-05-16 Thread Jonathan Peterson
At 21:08 15/05/01 +0100, you wrote: >They already offer it. >You can bar up to ten numbers (IIRC). I don't know how it deals >with withheld numbers. Never checked. I'm sure I remember reading somewhere that you always send your CID when you make a phone call. If you choose to withhold the ID, i