Paul Mison [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth:
*>On 29/05/2001 at 18:04 +0100, Yeoh Yiu wrote:
*>>So have you seen _Center of the World_ yet ?
*>
*>Nah, 'cos it's not out here yet. No release date is listed on IMDB.
*>Salon didn't like it, though:
Salon has good taste too. Sucked harder than watching the
So have you seen _Center of the World_ yet ?
YY
duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> see i dont mind 'lad's' magazines being covered in naked women,
> because i mean thats kinda what makes up the content of the magazine.
> but im very irritated by the fact that technology magazines are using
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:18:07AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> * David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 12:17:11PM +0100, Barbie wrote:
> > >
> > > Bugger! Brain thinking faster than my hands!
> >
> > Your hands *think*???
> >
>
> in fact, it was a recent Ange
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 12:17:11PM +0100, Barbie wrote:
> >
> > Bugger! Brain thinking faster than my hands!
>
> Your hands *think*???
>
in fact, it was a recent Angel episode
--
Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinu
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 12:17:11PM +0100, Barbie wrote:
> >
> > Bugger! Brain thinking faster than my hands!
>
> Your hands *think*???
>
> dha, sees a sci-fi movie in here somewhere...
>
that ones been done to death
--
Greg McCarroll
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 09:33:04AM +0100, James Powell wrote:
> So you don't fancy organizing a LPM Top 100 (well, maybe 25) then?
A friend of mine and I were thinking of setting up a amIwroxornot.com
site with all the Wrox authors (and their huge mugshots) on a voting
site. I reckon this is Simo
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 12:17:11PM +0100, Barbie wrote:
>
> Bugger! Brain thinking faster than my hands!
Your hands *think*???
dha, sees a sci-fi movie in here somewhere...
--
David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only prove
From: "Cross David - dcross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: Barbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 9:58 AM
>
> > From: "robert shiels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > "According to a recent survey, men say the first thing they notice
about
> > > a women are their eyes. And women say
> >> See, I find it's in the personality. Which doesn't come
> >> across too well in glossy magazine.
> >
> >Hmmm. I wonder how you'd go about making personality pr0n?
>
> Mills and Boon.
Well, no, I just had this conversation offlist. I'd say that personality
pr0n is an oxymoron. YMMV.
--
ma
At 11:06 21/05/01 +0100, you wrote:
>Dave Cross:
>
>> See, I find it's in the personality. Which doesn't come
>> across too well in glossy magazine.
>
>Hmmm. I wonder how you'd go about making personality pr0n?
Mills and Boon.
--
Jonathan Peterson
Technical Manager, Unified Ltd, 020 7383 6092
On Mon, 21 May 2001, James Powell wrote:
> So you don't fancy organizing a LPM Top 100 (well, maybe 25) then?
.. err .. well theres ... ugh . and .. arr ... and we could
always get .. shudder
nope .. don't reckon that ones a winner. I know some Womens Institute in
Yorkshire made it bigtime wi
> I seem to recall some comic giving a rant to the effect of "Used to be
> just the magazines on the top shelf, everyone knew where they were,
> everyone knew what they were for. Then these FHM, Loaded, etc though -
> huh? What are they, for blokes who "aren't sure" if they want to
> masturbate?"
Dave Cross:
> > > And besides, since when could you work out how sexy a
> > > woman (or man) was simply by looking at a photo.
> >
> >Its in the eyes, Dave, its in the eyes.
>
> See, I find it's in the personality. Which doesn't come
> across too well in glossy magazine.
Hmmm. I wonder how you
From: Barbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 9:58 AM
> From: "robert shiels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > "According to a recent survey, men say the first thing they notice about
> > a women are their eyes. And women say the first thing they notice about
> > men are: they're a bunch
From: "robert shiels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "According to a recent survey, men say the first thing they notice about
> a women are their eyes. And women say the first thing they notice about
> men are: they're a bunch of liars."
That's not quite true. Women initial assume that all men are autom
Robin Szemeti wrote:
> I suspect the current 'Lad's' magazines phase is a backlash against the
> crazy political correctness of the 80's .. hopefully the whole thing will
> settle down eventually.
If you see it lying around the reading 'Getting away with it - the story
of Loaded' by Tim Southwe
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 05:26:51PM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
> At 10:52 20/05/2001, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
> >On Sun, 20 May 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
> >
> > > I'm sure I'm really in the minority here, but I can't be the only one who
> > > finds all this discussion of the FHM list distasteful. I've n
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Cross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: Sara Cox - was Re: FHM Top 100 Sexiest Women
> At 20:50 20/05/2001, Mike Jarvis wrote:
> >Sunday,
Sunday, May 20, 2001, 3:17:03 PM, Dave Cross wrote:
DC> At 20:50 20/05/2001, Mike Jarvis wrote:
>>Sunday, May 20, 2001, 3:19:47 AM, Dave Cross wrote:
>>
>>DC> And besides, since when could you work out how sexy a woman (or man) was
>>DC> simply by looking at a photo.
>>
>>This is really two quest
At 20:50 20/05/2001, Mike Jarvis wrote:
>Sunday, May 20, 2001, 3:19:47 AM, Dave Cross wrote:
>
>DC> And besides, since when could you work out how sexy a woman (or man) was
>DC> simply by looking at a photo.
>
>This is really two questions:
>1) Can you tell from looking at a photo if this is someo
Sunday, May 20, 2001, 3:19:47 AM, Dave Cross wrote:
DC> And besides, since when could you work out how sexy a woman (or man) was
DC> simply by looking at a photo.
This is really two questions:
1) Can you tell from looking at a photo if this is someone you'd like
to have a relationship with? (N
Dave Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 00:06 20/05/2001, James Powell wrote:
> >On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 12:00:38AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
> > > Neil Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > Just picked up the latest FHM to check out the above mentioned list...
> > > >
> > > > The i
At 10:52 20/05/2001, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
>On Sun, 20 May 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
>
> > I'm sure I'm really in the minority here, but I can't be the only one who
> > finds all this discussion of the FHM list distasteful. I've never really
> > understood why intelligent men find it acceptable to o
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 10:47:43AM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote:
>
> I suspect the current 'Lad's' magazines phase is a backlash against the
> crazy political correctness of the 80's .. hopefully the whole thing will
> settle down eventually. I don't particularly care that much about it. The
> wome
>I suspect the current 'Lad's' magazines phase is a backlash against the
>crazy political correctness of the 80's .. hopefully the whole thing will
>settle down eventually.
[snip]
> I do find it rather objectionable is
>having them learing off the counter of every petrol station and
>newsagent y
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
> At 00:06 20/05/2001, James Powell wrote:
> >On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 12:00:38AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
> > > Neil Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > Just picked up the latest FHM to check out the above mentioned list...
> > > >
> > > > The in
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
> At 00:06 20/05/2001, James Powell wrote:
> >On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 12:00:38AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
> > > Neil Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > Just picked up the latest FHM to check out the above mentioned list...
> > > >
> > > > The i
Dave Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm sure I'm really in the minority here, but I can't be the only
> one who finds all this discussion of the FHM list distasteful. I've
> never really understood why intelligent men find it acceptable to
> objectify women in this way.
Just 'cause no one w
At 00:06 20/05/2001, James Powell wrote:
>On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 12:00:38AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
> > Neil Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Just picked up the latest FHM to check out the above mentioned list...
> > >
> > > The interesting bits are as follows;
> >
> > The really int
29 matches
Mail list logo
