On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Barbie [easynet] wrote:
> From: "Robin Szemeti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Barbie wrote:
> >
> > > They probably could only get away with saying they maintain it due to
> the
> > > amount of complex stuff in there, and potential legal implications if
> the
From: "Robin Szemeti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Barbie wrote:
>
> > They probably could only get away with saying they maintain it due to
the
> > amount of complex stuff in there, and potential legal implications if
they
> > said they designed it. But I'll agree with The Goth her
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Barbie wrote:
> They probably could only get away with saying they maintain it due to the
> amount of complex stuff in there, and potential legal implications if they
> said they designed it. But I'll agree with The Goth here, do we really want
> to associate with the buggers
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:57:08PM +0100, Dave Thorn wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:59:54PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
> > > Dave Thorn wrote:
> > >
> > > > that settles it, yes. everything's for sale, even pride.
> > >
> > > London Pride?
> >
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:57:08PM +0100, Dave Thorn wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:59:54PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
> > Dave Thorn wrote:
> >
> > > that settles it, yes. everything's for sale, even pride.
> >
> > London Pride?
>
> obviously. they don't just give it away or hoard it, y
From: "Lucy McWilliam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Beer good."
But Guinness is better ;)
Barbie
From: "Richard Clamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 01:15:17PM +0100, Simon Wilcox wrote:
> > Just saw this linked from a hugely obvious banner ad on the Register :
> >
> > http://training.gbdirect.co.uk/courses/perl/for_the_register.html
> >
> > Great idea to tie it in to a succes
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:09:16PM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Dave Thorn wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:59:54PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
> > > Dave Thorn wrote:
> > > > that settles it, yes. everything's for sale, even pride.
> > > London Pride?
> > obviously. t
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Mark Fowler wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
>
> > "Beer good."
>
> Beer Foamy.
Only when you add bubble bath...
L.
"A young, female, non-bearded, non-jumpered members of CAMRA? *shock*"
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
> "Beer good."
Beer Foamy.
--
s'' Mark Fowler London.pm Bath.pm
http://www.twoshortplanks.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
';use Term'Cap;$t=Tgetent Term'Cap{};print$t->Tputs(cl);for$w(split/ +/
){for(0.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:09:16PM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
>
> "Beer good."
beer : no beer
--
dave thorn | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Dave Thorn wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:59:54PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
> > Dave Thorn wrote:
> >
> > > that settles it, yes. everything's for sale, even pride.
> >
> > London Pride?
>
> obviously. they don't just give it away...
Shame.
L.
"Beer good."
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:59:54PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
> Dave Thorn wrote:
>
> > that settles it, yes. everything's for sale, even pride.
>
> London Pride?
obviously. they don't just give it away or hoard it, y'know?
--
dave thorn | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave Thorn wrote:
> that settles it, yes. everything's for sale, even pride.
London Pride?
--
simon wistowwireless systems coder
only second toughest
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:47:40PM +0100, Richard Clamp wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:43:27PM +0100, Dave Thorn wrote:
> > > I'm half tempted to see what they'd teach me though... :)
> >
> > personal hygiene? ;)
>
> So that's why you never come home anymore...
I'm sorry. I didn't want yo
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:43:27PM +0100, Dave Thorn wrote:
> > I'm half tempted to see what they'd teach me though... :)
>
> personal hygiene? ;)
So that's why you never come home anymore...
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Quoting Richard Clamp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> At least they only claim to be the maintenance team. Almost like
> boasting about being the team sent in to fetch the team sent in to
> rescue the hostages.
>
Hang on, that still sounds like the original team needed to be rescued.
I'd change that s
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:37:19PM +0100, Richard Clamp wrote:
>
> If on the other hand you want the dev team, I'm sure Barbie and I
*cough*
oh hang on, do I really want to be associated with the bastards?
> could figure something to tell you for the right amount of beer.
that settles it, yes
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 01:15:17PM +0100, Simon Wilcox wrote:
> Just saw this linked from a hugely obvious banner ad on the Register :
>
> http://training.gbdirect.co.uk/courses/perl/for_the_register.html
>
> Great idea to tie it in to a success story I thought.
Grumble grumble.
At least they
Just saw this linked from a hugely obvious banner ad on the Register :
http://training.gbdirect.co.uk/courses/perl/for_the_register.html
Great idea to tie it in to a success story I thought.
Simon.
Just saw this linked from a hugely obvious banner ad on the Register :
http://training.gbdirect.co.uk/courses/perl/for_the_register.html
Great idea to tie it in to a success story I thought.
Simon.
21 matches
Mail list logo