Re: Still screwing up References: (was Re: Job: I'm looking for one..)
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:17:17 +0100 (BST), Mark Fowler wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
>
> > You're right, the referencing is a bit screwed up. I'll take a look at
> > it today.
Actually, that message was OK.
> Your webmail CC is screwed up too. On my mails there's now new line after
> the Cc: so I get a line that says
>
> Cc: X-Mailer: foo
>
> which my mail client (PINE) wants to reply to...
That's a bug in PINE, then. There is actually a newline after Cc:, but like some other
parsers (including an early version of mine), PINE can't cope with an empty field.
MIME::Parser does something strange, too: with empty fields, ->get_all returns either
('') or (undef) (I can't remember which), but with non-empty fields, ->get_all returns
the contents with newlines intact, confusing things immensely for formatting code.
--
Peter Haworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"My own writing [...] is of such high quality that it's almost a new media in
itself. There is writing, and there is My Writing. UltraWriting. Writing++.
Object-orientated writing with full pre-emptive multi-tasking running at
1000 rpm with a 20ms seek time, at a reasonable price (credit available)."
-- Ashley Pomeroy
Re: Still screwing up References: (was Re: Job: I'm looking for one..)
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
> You're right, the referencing is a bit screwed up. I'll take a look at
> it today.
Your webmail CC is screwed up too. On my mails there's now new line after
the Cc: so I get a line that says
Cc: X-Mailer: foo
which my mail client (PINE) wants to reply to...
Later.
Mark.
--
print "\n",map{my$a="\n"if(length$_>6);' 'x(36-length($_)/2)."$_\n$a"} (
Name => 'Mark Fowler',Title => 'Technology Developer' ,
Firm => 'Profero Ltd',Web => 'http://www.profero.com/' ,
Email => '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', Phone => '+44 (0) 20 7700 9960' )
Re: Still screwing up References: (was Re: Job: I'm looking for one..)
At Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:08:44 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 08:02:39 -0500 (EST), Dave Cross wrote: > > At Wed, 28 Mar 2001 12:34:41 +0100, Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 12:02:48PM +0100, alex wrote: > > > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > But look at your headers: > > References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Where's <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dave? You're right, the referencing is a bit screwed up. I'll take a look at it today. Dave... [who handily has his copy of "Programming Internet Email" on his desk]
