Hi Matt,
when it comes to voting, nvotes.com has a good comment:
"A cryptographically secure voting system is one that supports privacy
and end-to-end verifiability."
https://nvotes.com/secure-voting-definition/
Ingo
Am 31.12.2017 um 18:02 schrieb G. Matthew Rice:
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at
Hi Matt,
Am 30.12.2017 um 01:07 schrieb G. Matthew Rice:
> This means electing the board, approving
> auditors and similar fun.
>
> With that said, we need to set up the infrastructure to enable this
> governance and I've been thinking that using a public blockchain would
> be interesting.
On Mon, 01 Jan 2018 at 17:39:47 +0100
Anselm Lingnau wrote:
> Running the LPI on blockchain technology would presumably
> only be useful if enough people can be incentivised to waste CPU cyles (and
> boost their electricity bills) signing transactions on the blockchain
Matt Rice wrote:
> With that said, we need to set up the infrastructure to enable this
> governance and I've been thinking that using a public blockchain would be
> interesting. There are some non-blockchain open source projects to help
> with this like: https://heliosvoting.org/, too.
I
I prefer to keep the general exam development discussion on this list.
Mattermost might be useful for detailed discussions on specific topics or
during SME work on specific topics. As Anselm points out, introducing
another platform, with dedicated credentials, has the high risk of loosing
people
Jeroen Baten wrote:
> +1 on mattermost!
Mattermost is an impressive piece of software, but I am on Slack for one
project and on a couple of different Rocketchat instances for others. It
frankly sucks to have to keep an eye on N separate IM platforms, and I don't
like the way they're all