Bryan J Smith wrote:
[...]
[4] http://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=236
*Ab*so*lu*te*ly* hilarious! :-)
--
Alessandro Selli
Tel: 340.839.73.05
http://alessandro.route-add.net, VOIP: sip:dhatarat...@ekiga.net
Chiavi PGP/GPG keys: B7FD89FD, 4A904FD9
___
On 20/06/2013 22:14, Alessandro Selli wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 20/06/2013 12:32, Alessandro Selli wrote:
I'm just playing the devil's advocate here.
Most modern distributions use the ext4 driver to handle all ext*
filesystems. ext4 does support the most often used attributes, the
On 20/06/2013 22:30, Bryan J Smith wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Alessandro Selli
alessandrose...@linux.com mailto:alessandrose...@linux.com wrote:
Aren't there already several plain awareness areas?
Actually, that's the question for Exam Writers under Bloom's Taxonomy.
I
On 20/06/2013 18:36, Anselm Lingnau wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
These days rcs is primarily a sysadmin tool whereas CVS/SVN/Git are
primarily developer's tools
RCS sucks as a sysadmin tool, for two reasons: (a) it does not track a file's
permissions, and (b) in many cases several files
Alessandro Selli wrote:
However I noticed that even Debian stable no longer has wireless-tools
WHOA! Wrong:
$ apt-cache search wireless-tools
wireless-tools - Tools for manipulating Linux Wireless Extensions
Maybe they are just no longer installed by default, or maybe I purged
them out
Alessandro Selli wrote:
I just think that it would take a bare minute telling people
that:
1) there are more attributes than ls or stat show you;
2) they can be seen with lsattr and set/uset with chattr;
3) the really useful and fully implemented/supported ones are the
immutable and
Anselm Lingnau ha scritto:
Alessandro Selli wrote:
I just think that it would take a bare minute telling people
that:
1) there are more attributes than ls or stat show you;
2) they can be seen with lsattr and set/uset with chattr;
3) the really useful and fully implemented/supported ones
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Alessandro Selli
alessandrose...@linux.com wrote:
4) for a full list of supported attributes see man chattr(1).
I wouldn't bother putting file attributes in LPIC-1 because they're not used
a
So, in summary, let's save the *attr and capabilities talk for LPIC-1
G. Matthew Rice wrote:
[...]
I can also add the iw command to the key files list, too. I have it in
/usr/sbin but I'm reluctant to put in /usr/sbin/iw as the path unless
it's universal. Can anyone confirm or deny this?
$ lsb_release -drc
Description:Debian GNU/Linux 7.1 (wheezy)
Release:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Alessandro Selli
alessandrose...@linux.com wrote:
I can also add the iw command to the key files list, too. I have it in
/usr/sbin but I'm reluctant to put in /usr/sbin/iw as the path unless
it's universal. Can anyone confirm or deny this?
$ lsb_release -drc
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Alessandro Selli alessandrose...@linux.com
wrote:
G. Matthew Rice wrote:
[...]
I can also add the iw command to the key files list, too. I have it in
/usr/sbin but I'm reluctant to put in /usr/sbin/iw as the path unless
it's universal. Can anyone confirm
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.comwrote:
So it's like lilo then (recently discussed here)?
I concur on Ext4, it's the kernel module used for all Ext* file systems
since 2010 or so.
I too don't think fs attrs worthy of inclusion in an exam, they are just
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.comwrote:
I could go along with that, especially if questions were worded
something along the lines of
You can't edit a file you own but the permissions are 644, what's up?
and possible answers are fs is mounted ro, chattr
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
These days rcs is primarily a sysadmin tool whereas CVS/SVN/Git are
primarily developer's tools
But I'm not advocating we test rcs as we really don't need to do
exhaustive testing. It's after all a statistical
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Anselm Lingnau
anselm.lingnau+exam...@linupfront.de wrote:
RCS sucks as a sysadmin tool, for two reasons: (a) it does not track a
file's
permissions, and (b) in many cases several files have to be changed at the
same time to achieve some desired goal – even
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Alessandro Selli alessandrose...@linux.com
wrote:
Aren't there already several plain awareness areas?
Actually, that's the question for Exam Writers under Bloom's Taxonomy. I
think we were just giving examples of potential questions as nothing more
than
Bryan J Smith wrote:
[...]
I kid you not when I see this _constantly_. ;)
Amazing.
___
lpi-examdev mailing list
lpi-examdev@lpi.org
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
Scott Lamberton wrote on lpi-disc...@lpi.org:
Linux Professional Institute revises objectives for LPIC-2 and LPIC-3
Linux certification programs
(Sacramento, CA, USA: June 18, 2013) The Linux Professional Institute
(LPI:http://www.lpi.org), the world's premier Linux certification
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Alessandro Selli
alessandrose...@linux.com wrote:
1) extended file attributes (chattr and lsattr);
chattr was dropped from LPIC-1 back in 2008/9 (or whenever these
changes were made):
http://wiki.lpi.org/wiki/LPIC1AndLPIC2SummaryVersion2To3
probably
19 matches
Mail list logo
