Re: [Lsr] OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels - draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-04.txt

Hi Anton, I tend to agree with Ketan, but with slightly different proposal. Would not it be simpler to advertise IPv6 Router Address TLV (TLV type 3) by OSPFv2 Opaque LSA (in addition to advertising of Router Address TLV) and to advertise Router Address TLV (TLV type 1) by OSPFv3

[Lsr] IETF 103 Preliminary Agenda

Please see the IETF 103 Preliminary LSR Agenda: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/103/materials/agenda-103-lsr-01 Note that we’re going to need to stick to the agenda so please plan your presentations accordingly. I see some of the presenters on the agenda who are notorious for using all

Re: [Lsr] OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels - draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-04.txt

   Hi Ketan, 1. I am not sure I understood the question. Your example says "using the TE topology from OSPFv2 to compute a tunnel". In that case TE router ID is an IPv4 address. So no, advertising IPv6 address won't help to identify the tunnel. 2. my opinion (not discussed with other

Re: [Lsr] OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels - draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-04.txt

   Hi Gunter,    we agree with the proposed change and will make it in the next revision, probably even rephrase this sentence. --- Anton On 10/24/18 12:59, Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) wrote: Looks fine. One item I would like to see changed (or at least discussed) I have a

Re: [Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-08: (with COMMENT)

Hi Ben, On 10/25/18, 8:22 AM, "Benjamin Kaduk" wrote: Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To

[Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-08: (with COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

Re: [Lsr] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-08: (with COMMENT)

This is indeed an absolutely not critical comment. Please address it whenever you feel is appropriate. -m Le 2018-10-25 à 11:54, Acee Lindem (acee) a écrit : > Hi Peter, Martin, > We can address these comments after the draft is IESG approved and on the RFC > Editor queue as long as they don't

Re: [Lsr] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-08: (with COMMENT)

Hi Peter, Martin, We can address these comments after the draft is IESG approved and on the RFC Editor queue as long as they don't change the normative specifications. I'm hoping this simple and draft which has an existing implementation will be approved. Thanks, Acee On 10/25/18, 4:54 AM,

Re: [Lsr] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-08: (with COMMENT)

Hi Martin, I have addressed your comment, bu I'm unable to publish the updated version at this point as the submission is closed till November 3rd. thanks, Peter On 23/10/18 11:15 , Martin Vigoureux wrote: Martin Vigoureux has entered the following ballot position for