Hi, Les:
IGP is now considering the dynamic metric(for example, the delay metric within
flexalgo), not only the static metic.
The proposed “AggCost” is also one kind of dynamic metric. It can assist the
new clients to avoid the already heavy-burden application server.
With the “Flow
Linda -
From: Linda Dunbar
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 7:47 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Seeking feedback to the revised draft-dunbar-lsr-5g-edge-compute
Les,
Starting with a clean slate:
Problem:
Most applications are instantiated at multiple locations to
Les,
Starting with a clean slate:
Problem:
Most applications are instantiated at multiple locations to achieve optimal
performance. Traditional shortest path to reach one single destination is
making load balancers the bottleneck, or pushing the traffic management
responsibility to DNS.
From
Hi, Tony:
-Original Message-
From: lsr-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of Tony Li
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 4:24 AM
To: Aijun Wang
Cc: lsr ; lsr-...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps ;
draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attribu...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for
Hi, Les:
I think we should find the most efficient way to accomplish the work.
The draft that is adopting, or is adopted, or is in the WGLC or in the IESG
view process is reasonable to be updated to address the comments during the
process.
I think update the draft accordingly to address the
Hi Aijun,
> We are trying to reuse the existing mechanism to solve such problem, but as
> mentioned in
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/kTWLct7VgEfOxexdwzwcFS3Ctqc/:
This link doesn’t work.
> "[WAJ] Reuse the Link TLV that defined in inter-AS-TE-v2/v3 to contain such
>
Aijun -
I am aware that, subsequent to this email, you posted a revised version of the
draft. But in regards to how I prefer to move forward I am choosing to respond
to this email.
It is important to remember that this thread is a 2 week WG adoption call. The
primary purpose of this thread is
Hi, Christian:
The benefit of the proposed solution is that for inter-AS scenarios, it can
accomplish the automatic pairing for the two ends of inter-AS link without the
explicitly configuration for the remote end information.
In other scenarios, it can also contain useful information for the
Peter Psenak writes:
Aijun,
On 05/01/2022 16:20, Aijun Wang wrote:
[WAJ] The above remote information must be configured manually on the local
device. It is paired by manual. Thinking there are many links among the ASBRs,
would you like to configure them manually for every remote ends on
Hi WG,Support adoption.Best Regards,
Ran
-Original Message-From: lsr-boun...@ietf.org On
Behalf Of ChristianHoppsSent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 2:59 PMTo:
lsr@ietf.orgCc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org;
Hi Les,
If someone (not necessarily you) wants to write up any of these proposals
> then we (the WG/Routing Area) could have a meaningful discussion about such
> alternatives.
>
Since you keep asking for a write up on an alternate solution(s) and since
you clearly stated that your connectivity
Hi, All experts:
Upon the responses from this adoption call, we have updated to the draft
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes to
address the comments received from now.
If you have still other concerns, please responses.
We are glad to address your concerns
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : Advertisement of Stub Link Attributes
Authors : Aijun Wang
Zhibo Hu
13 matches
Mail list logo
