I support progressing this document.
Changes are straightforward/non-controversial and have no impact on the
operation of the protocol - no reason we should not expedite this.
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: Lsr On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
> Sent: Sunday, June 5, 2022 2:48 AM
>
Hi Acee,
Yes, the Arista implementation shipped.
T
> On Jun 10, 2022, at 7:10 AM, Acee Lindem (acee)
> wrote:
>
> Initially, there was a lot interest and energy in reducing the flooding
> overhead in dense drafts. Now, it seems the interest and energy has waned.
> IMO, this draft
Aijun,
On 08/06/2022 13:22, Aijun Wang wrote:
Hi, Peter:
“MAX-Value” metric just indicates the associated prefix will be removed if it
is installed previously, as the same function of premature aging.
If the prefix doesn’t exist previously on the receiving router, it will do
nothing when it
Initially, there was a lot interest and energy in reducing the flooding
overhead in dense drafts. Now, it seems the interest and energy has waned. IMO,
this draft contains some very valuable extensions to the IGPs. I discussed this
with the editors and one suggestion was to go ahead and publish
