I support progressing this document. Changes are straightforward/non-controversial and have no impact on the operation of the protocol - no reason we should not expedite this.
Les > -----Original Message----- > From: Lsr <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Christian Hopps > Sent: Sunday, June 5, 2022 2:48 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; lsr- > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [Lsr] WG last call for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology-00 > > Given the simplicity of this document and having received no objections or > edits prior to or during the adoption call we'll be moving it immediately to > WGLC... > > This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending Jun 19th, 2022, for: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology/ > > Authors, > > Please indicate to the list, your knowledge of any IPR related to this work. > > Thanks, > Chris. > > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
