r@ietf.org>;mpls ;
> *Date: *2023年08月29日 11:03
> *Subject: **Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
> draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt*
>
> Hi Tony
>
> Would the granularity you would want for the modular node that is now
> virtualized into virtual routing instances be
lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tony Li
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2023 5:36 AM
>> To: liu.ya...@zte.com.cn
>> Cc: Les Ginsberg ; mpls ; lsr@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
>> draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt
>>
>
sberg)
To: Tony Li ;刘尧00165286;
Cc: mpls ;lsr@ietf.org ;
Date: 2023年08月29日 23:48
Subject: RE: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt
I am in agreement with Tony.
It seems that there are potential use cases for link specific RLD.
As to why RFC 9088 cho
.
Best Regards,
Yao
Original
From: TonyLi mailto:tony...@tony.li>>
To: 刘尧00165286;
Cc: Les Ginsberg mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com>>;mpls
mailto:m...@ietf.org>>;lsr@ietf.org
mailto:lsr@ietf.org>>;
Date: 2023年08月29日 10:36
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
dra
velopment program.
> PS: I am not sure, I may missed a good example.
> Eduard
> From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tony Li
> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2023 5:36 AM
> To: liu.ya...@zte.com.cn
> Cc: Les Ginsberg ; mpls ; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version
inal
> From: TonyLi
> To: 刘尧00165286;
> Cc: Les Ginsberg ;mpls ;lsr@ietf.org
> ;
> Date: 2023年08月29日 10:36
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
> draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt
>
> Hi Yao,
> Please consider the case of a modular node with a
Hi Robert,
Precise interface information naturally falls out of any path computation done
for traffic engineering.
Regards,
Tony
> On Aug 29, 2023, at 2:31 AM, Robert Raszuk wrote:
>
> Hi Tony,
>
> Unless you are using precise interface based packet steering (which may not
> be a great i
Hi Tony,
Unless you are using precise interface based packet steering (which may not
be a great idea to start with) how do you know on which line card type your
packets arrive/exit ?
Just curious ...
Thx,
R.
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 4:36 AM Tony Li wrote:
>
> Hi Yao,
>
> Please consider the ca
a
To: Tony Li ;
Cc: Les Ginsberg ;刘尧00165286;lsr@ietf.org
;mpls ;
Date: 2023年08月29日 11:03
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt
Hi Tony
Would the granularity you would want for the modular node that is now
virtualized into virtual ro
stack.
Best Regards,
Yao
Original
From: TonyLi
To: 刘尧00165286;
Cc: Les Ginsberg ;mpls ;lsr@ietf.org
;
Date: 2023年08月29日 10:36
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt
Hi Yao,
Please consider the case of a modular node with a number of diff
29, 2023 5:36 AM
To: liu.ya...@zte.com.cn
Cc: Les Ginsberg ; mpls ; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt
Hi Yao,
Please consider the case of a modular node with a number of different line
cards, where the line cards are based on
Hi Tony
Would the granularity you would want for the modular node that is now
virtualized into virtual routing instances be on per routing instance
level.
Each vendor has a different flavor of how this virtualization is done.
So the MSD capability would be at that level.
Kind Regards
Gyan
On M
Hi Yao,
Please consider the case of a modular node with a number of different line
cards, where the line cards are based on different forwarding engines.
RLD needs to be link specific.
Regards,
Tony
> On Aug 28, 2023, at 6:55 PM,
> wrote:
>
> Hi Les,
>
> Thanks a lot for your review and
13 matches
Mail list logo
