Acee,
I’m not aware of any IPR that applies to the draft.
Regards,
Jeff
> On Apr 11, 2019, at 18:09, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>
> Authors, Contributors,
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to
> draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-07?
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in complia
Hi, Huaimo,
Why do we need to compute a whole backup path and enable flooding at each
hop? In your example, when R0-R2 and R3-R9 fail, R0 (and R3) will find out
that its neighbor R1 (and R2) are no longer on the FT. R0 (and R3) will
then enable temporary flooding on R0-R1 (and R3-R2), which fixes
Hi,
I'm not in favour of this draft.
As already mention, I don't see the interest to duplicate TE attributes in new
Extended Link Opaque LSA. For me, it is only a matter of implementation to look
at various place in the OSPF TE Database to take Traffic Engineering
information.
>From an operat
Hi,
I'm not in favour of this draft.
For me there is no interest to advertises TE attributes per application. TE
attributes are attached to a linkand are agnostics of application. Looking to
listed applications, I don't understand why we need to duplicate TE attributes.
We could perfectly mana
I am not aware of any relevant IPR.
Les
From: Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 9:10 AM
To: draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-re...@ietf.org
Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; Hannes Gredler
; Acee Lindem (acee)
Subject: IPR Poll for "OSPF Link Traffic Engineering (T
Hello,
I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft.
Thanks,
Ketan
From: Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: 11 April 2019 21:40
To: draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-re...@ietf.org
Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; Hannes Gredler
; Acee Lindem (acee)
Subject: IPR Poll for "OSPF Link Traffic En
Hi Acee,
I'm not aware of any relevant IPR.
thanks,
Peter
On 11/04/2019 18:09 , Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
Authors, Contributors,
Are you aware of any IPR that applies
to draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-07?
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RF
LSR Working Group,
This begins a two week WG last call for the subject document. Please enter
your support or objection to the document before 12:00 AM (EDT) on Friday,
April 27th, 2019.
Thanks,
Acee
___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.i
Authors, Contributors,
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-07?
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond
I’m not aware of any IPR related to this document.
Thanks.
s.
> On Apr 10, 2019, at 11:35 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>
> Authors, Contributors,
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-isis-te-app-06.txt?
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR
I'm not aware of any IPR.
Yours Irrespectively,
John
Juniper Internal
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 5:30 PM
To: draft-ietf-isis-te-...@ietf.org
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IS-IS TE Attributes per application" -
draft-ietf-isis-te-
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : OSPF Link Traffic Engineering (TE) Attribute Reuse
Authors : Peter Psenak
Les Gi
I am not aware of any relevant IPR.
Peter
On 10/04/2019 23:35 , Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
Authors, Contributors,
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-isis-te-app-06.txt?
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 537
13 matches
Mail list logo