Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call IPR Poll for IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery - draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05

Hi, Acee, I am not aware of any other IPR that applies to this draft. Best Regards, Qiufang Ma From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2021 12:37 AM To: draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-supp...@ietf.org Cc: lsr@ietf.org Subject: WG Last Call IPR Poll for

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call IPR Poll for IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery - draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05

Hi Acee: I am not aware of any other IPR that applies to draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support besides the one that has already been disclosed. -Qin 发件人: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] 发送时间: 2021年7月22日 0:37 收件人: draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-supp...@ietf.org 抄送:

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis

The WGLC has ended. I may have missed it but I do not see any feedback from Xiaodong Duan for IPR. That is still required to the list. Thanks, Chris. > On Feb 17, 2021, at 10:30 AM, Christian Hopps wrote: > > Hi LSR and TEAS, > > This begins a joint WG last call for: > >

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call IPR Poll for IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery - draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05

Hi Acee, I am not aware of any other IPR that applies to this I-D. Thanks! Dhruv On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 10:07 PM Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > The following IPR has been filed for > draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support: > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3351/ > > > > Are you

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery - draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05

I support progression of this document. Regarding the new registry being requested in Section 8.2, given that the registry applies to both OSPF and IS-IS codepoints, I think it would make more sense to place the registry under Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) Parameters rather than under OSPF.

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call IPR Poll for IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery - draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05

Hi Chairs, All. I am not aware of any other IPR relevant to this document. BR, Dan. From: Diego R. Lopez Sent: 21 July 2021 17:59 To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-supp...@ietf.org Cc: lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: WG Last Call IPR Poll for IGP extension for PCEP

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call IPR Poll for IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery - draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05

Hi, As an author, I am not aware of any other IPR relevant to this document -- "Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno" Dr Diego R. Lopez Telefonica I+D https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr2lopez/ e-mail: diego.r.lo...@telefonica.com Mobile: +34 682 051 091

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call IPR Poll for IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery - draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05

Note that all draft authors must explicitly respond to the IPR poll… Thanks, Acee From: Lsr on behalf of "Acee Lindem (acee)" Date: Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 12:38 PM To: "draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-supp...@ietf.org" Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: [Lsr] WG Last Call IPR Poll for

[Lsr] WG Last Call for IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery - draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05

This begins a 3-week WG Last Call, ending on August 4th, 2021, for draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support. Please indicate your support or objection to this list before the end of the WG last call. The longer WG last call is to account for IETF week.

[Lsr] WG Last Call IPR Poll for IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery - draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05

The following IPR has been filed for draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3351/ Are you aware of any other IPR that applies to draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-01.txt

Hi Shraddha, > 3.Advertising generic metric in an application independent manner in > legacy TLV 22 and ELO LSA > does not violate RFC 8919/8920. Application-independent attributes are not > expected to use RFC 8919/8920 > mechanisms. Generic metric is like igp cost. IGP-cost is never advertised