John -
The solution you propose is fine with me.
I will update it in the next version.
As we are still waiting for a few reviews I will wait a bit in case other
changes are needed.
I will do the same to
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis/ as well.
Les
>
Hi Ketan, Peter,
> On May 3, 2023, at 9:30 AM, Ketan Talaulikar wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> Please check inline below.
>
> On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 6:16 PM Peter Psenak wrote:
> Hi Ketan,
>
> On 03/05/2023 06:09, Ketan Talaulikar wrote:
> > Hello Authors/All,
> >
> > I think there are a couple
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Link State Routing
(LSR) WG of the IETF.
Title : Update to OSPF Terminology
Authors : Mike Fox
Acee Lindem
On 5/3/23 1:12 PM, John Scudder wrote:
On May 3, 2023, at 11:04 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote:
2) Please reconsider the link to the mailarchive in the RFC. Put it in the
shepherd writeup or in the history in the datatracker as a comment (chairs
can
do this). Otherwise it adds to the list
> On May 3, 2023, at 11:04 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> wrote:
>
>> 2) Please reconsider the link to the mailarchive in the RFC. Put it in the
>> shepherd writeup or in the history in the datatracker as a comment (chairs
>> can
>> do this). Otherwise it adds to the list of URLs that we have to
Robert -
Thanx for your review - apologies for the delay in responding.
Please see inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Sparks via Datatracker
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2023 1:09 PM
> To: gen-...@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org;
Hi Peter,
Please check inline below.
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 6:16 PM Peter Psenak wrote:
> Hi Ketan,
>
> On 03/05/2023 06:09, Ketan Talaulikar wrote:
> > Hello Authors/All,
> >
> > I think there are a couple of issues with this document related to
> > OSPFv2 aspects. My apologies for this last
Hi John,
I will fixed these in the next version.
thanks,
Peter
On 02/05/2023 20:30, John Scudder wrote:
Hi Peter,
All good, I figured it was something like that. Two residual nits —
1. One “datapalne” got left in. I guess you need something to seed version 11
after all…
2. It looks like
Hi Ketan,
On 03/05/2023 06:09, Ketan Talaulikar wrote:
Hello Authors/All,
I think there are a couple of issues with this document related to
OSPFv2 aspects. My apologies for this last minute notice and not
catching them earlier during the WGLC. >
1) The OSPFv2 IP Algorithm Prefix
