Acee -
Sorry, for some reason I thought you had copied the RFC5130 text verbatim - but
I see that is not the case.
Apologies for the noise.
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: Acee Lindem
> Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 12:56 PM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> Cc: Tony Przygienda ;
Hi Les,
> On Mar 4, 2024, at 15:48, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote:
>
> Acee -
>
> Consider two ABRs propagating a prefix they received with three tags. One ABR
> supports only one tag and one ABR supports two tags.
> How do we insure that at least one tag is in common when the prefix is
>
Acee -
Consider two ABRs propagating a prefix they received with three tags. One ABR
supports only one tag and one ABR supports two tags.
How do we insure that at least one tag is in common when the prefix is
propagated?
Given that the only MUST here is that all implementations MUST support
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-admin-tags-16.txt is now available. It is a
work item of the Link State Routing (LSR) WG of the IETF.
Title: Extensions to OSPF for Advertising Prefix Administrative Tags
Authors: Acee Lindem
Peter Psenak
Yingzhen Qu
Name:
Hi Les,
> On Mar 3, 2024, at 11:41 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> wrote:
>
> Not overly complicate things...
>
> The requirement to ensure that the first tag remains the first tag when tags
> are propagated suggests that the following language from RFC 5130 is a bit
> lax:
>
> "When
Hi Mirja,
Thanks for your follow up on this and your time
Please see inline [Bruno3]
> -Original Message-
> From: Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
> Sent: Thursday, February 29, 2024 3:30 PM
> To: DECRAENE Bruno INNOV/NET
> Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ;
> gsoli...@protonmail.com;
Hi Les,
Thank you for your comments and providing RFC 5305 as a reference.
We will review the entire document and update it to ensure a more accurate
description.
Best Regards,
Liyan
邮件原文发件人："Les Ginsberg \\(ginsberg\\)"
收件人：Yingzhen Qu
,lsr ,lsr-chairs 抄
送:
