h the links.
>>
>> And the description in this draft you mentioned is written taking example
>> by RFC9088(section 4. Advertising ERLD Using IS-IS).
>>
>> I'll explicitly state the scope of the new MSD in the next version.
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>
lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tony Li
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2023 5:36 AM
>> To: liu.ya...@zte.com.cn
>> Cc: Les Ginsberg ; mpls ; lsr@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
>> draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt
>>
>
)
To: Tony Li ;刘尧00165286;
Cc: mpls ;lsr@ietf.org ;
Date: 2023年08月29日 23:48
Subject: RE: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt
I am in agreement with Tony.
It seems that there are potential use cases for link specific RLD.
As to why RFC 9088 chose
Best Regards,
Yao
Original
From: TonyLi mailto:tony...@tony.li>>
To: 刘尧00165286;
Cc: Les Ginsberg mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com>>;mpls
mailto:m...@ietf.org>>;lsr@ietf.org
mailto:lsr@ietf.org>>;
Date: 2023年08月29日 10:36
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
draft-li
'll explicitly state the scope of the new MSD in the next version.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Yao
>
> Original
> From: LesGinsberg(ginsberg) mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com>>
> To: 刘尧00165286;m...@ietf.org <mailto:m...@ietf.org>>;lsr@ietf.org mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
> From: TonyLi
> To: 刘尧00165286;
> Cc: Les Ginsberg ;mpls ;lsr@ietf.org
> ;
> Date: 2023年08月29日 10:36
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
> draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt
>
> Hi Yao,
> Please consider the case of a modular node with a numb
LD Using IS-IS).
>>>
>>> I'll explicitly state the scope of the new MSD in the next version.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Yao
>>>
>>> Original
>>> From: LesGinsberg(ginsberg) mailt
both per link and per node
> capability – and if not why not?
>
>
>
> Thanx.
>
>
>
> Les
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Lsr *On Behalf Of * liu.ya...@zte.com.cn
> *Sent:* Monday, August 28, 2023 12:33 AM
> *To:* m...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org
> *Subject:
To: Tony Li ;
Cc: Les Ginsberg ;刘尧00165286;lsr@ietf.org
;mpls ;
Date: 2023年08月29日 11:03
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt
Hi Tony
Would the granularity you would want for the modular node that is now
virtualized into virtual routing
.
Best Regards,
Yao
Original
From: TonyLi
To: 刘尧00165286;
Cc: Les Ginsberg ;mpls ;lsr@ietf.org
;
Date: 2023年08月29日 10:36
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt
Hi Yao,
Please consider the case of a modular node with a number of different
29, 2023 5:36 AM
To: liu.ya...@zte.com.cn
Cc: Les Ginsberg ; mpls ; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt
Hi Yao,
Please consider the case of a modular node with a number of different line
cards, where the line cards are based
*LesGinsberg(ginsberg)
> *To: *刘尧00165286;m...@ietf.org ;lsr@ietf.org >;
> *Date: *2023年08月28日 20:57
> *Subject: **RE: [Lsr] Fw: New Version Notification for
> draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt*
>
> Yao –
>
>
>
> Both RFC 8476(OSPF) and RFC 8491(IS-IS
ou intend to support both per link and per node
> capability – and if not why not?
>
>
>
> Thanx.
>
>
>
> Les
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Lsr On Behalf Of liu.ya...@zte.com.cn
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 12:33 AM
> To
13 matches
Mail list logo
