Re: [Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang

2023-12-04 Thread Tony Przygienda
cted > > *From:* Lsr *On Behalf Of *Acee Lindem > *Sent:* Thursday, November 16, 2023 11:33 PM > *To:* Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > *Cc:* Loa Andersson ; lsr@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang > > > > Speaking as a WG contributor: >

Re: [Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang

2023-11-18 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Lindem Cc: DECRAENE Bruno INNOV/NET ; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Loa Andersson ; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang Hi, About the name, here are some suggestions about the module name and prefix: * ietf-isis-feature-support.yang, isis-fs (YANG Module

Re: [Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang

2023-11-18 Thread Yingzhen Qu
nge Restricted > > From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem > > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2023 11:33 PM > > To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > > Cc: Loa Andersson ; lsr@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang > > Speaking as a WG con

Re: [Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang

2023-11-17 Thread Acee Lindem
: Loa Andersson ; lsr@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang > Speaking as a WG contributor: > Hi Les, > I think a simpler name is better - perhaps ietf-isis-feature-support.yang > with YANG prefix isis-fs would be better. Which brings me to my next a

Re: [Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang

2023-11-17 Thread bruno . decraene
Orange Restricted From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2023 11:33 PM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Cc: Loa Andersson ; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang Speaking as a WG contributor: Hi Les, I think a simpler name is better

Re: [Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang

2023-11-16 Thread Shraddha Hegde
Business Use Only From: Lsr On Behalf Of Yingzhen Qu Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 4:28 AM To: Tony Li Cc: Acee Lindem ; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Loa Andersson ; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang [External Email. Be cautious of content] Speaking as a co

Re: [Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang

2023-11-16 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Acee – Thanx for the comments – inline. From: Acee Lindem Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2023 2:33 PM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Cc: Loa Andersson ; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang Speaking as a WG contributor: Hi Les, I think a simpler name is better

Re: [Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang

2023-11-16 Thread Yingzhen Qu
Support" was "Yes - something > like that." > > The draft authors have not yet discussed this - but we will and share the > proposed new name. > Other suggestions welcomed. > > Les > > -Original Message- > From: Lsr On Behalf Of Loa Andersson >

Re: [Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang

2023-11-16 Thread Tony Li
;> response to Tony Li's suggestion of "IS-IS Support" was "Yes - something >> like that." >> >> The draft authors have not yet discussed this - but we will and share the >> proposed new name. >> Other suggestions welcomed. >> >> Le

Re: [Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang

2023-11-16 Thread Acee Lindem
that." > > The draft authors have not yet discussed this - but we will and share the > proposed new name. > Other suggestions welcomed. > > Les > >> -Original Message- >> From: Lsr On Behalf Of Loa Andersson >> Sent: Thursday, November

Re: [Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang

2023-11-16 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
ot yet discussed this - but we will and share the proposed new name. Other suggestions welcomed. Les > -Original Message- > From: Lsr On Behalf Of Loa Andersson > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2023 2:06 AM > To: lsr@ietf.org > Subject: [Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-i

[Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang

2023-11-16 Thread Loa Andersson
Working Group, During the presentation of draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang there was a rather strong opposition in the chat against using the ISO-term "PICS" in an IETF document. I think the term "Support" was suggested (excuse me if I missed something), but I'm not that impressed, and would