I think that the only time we should include the protocol (in addition to
'-lsr-') is if we have split documents (for whatever reason) on the same
solution. We have an example of this actually:
draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-09
draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd-09
Going forward w
Yes, I agree with Chris. That seems as a reasonable approach going forward.
G/
-Original Message-
From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2018 16:32
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Acee Lindem (acee)
Subject: Re: [Lsr]
Chris -
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian Hopps
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 7:32 AM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> Cc: Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ginsberg-isis-
> rfc7810bis-00.txt
>
>
> I think that the only
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using OSPF
Authors : Jeff Tantsura
Uma Chunduri
This begins an LSR WG last call for the subject draft. Please send your
comments to this list prior to 12:00 AM GMT, April 20th, 2018.
Thanks,
Acee and Chris
___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
Authors,
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to
draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd-10.txt?
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs
3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this
Authors,
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to
draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd-10.txt?
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs
3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this
