FWIW TEAS, which clashes with LSR, is in the process of being swapped wth
CCAMP. I expect this should be finalized today or tomorrow...
Lou
On March 7, 2018 5:22:59 AM Christian Hopps wrote:
Toerless Eckert writes:
Thanks, Acee - too bad.
Very much
Toerless Eckert writes:
Thanks, Acee - too bad.
Very much a fan of creation of LSR. Sad that it meant moving from
two underused WG meetings to one WG meeting that does not have enough
time for new work. Reminds me of TSVWG. *sigh*
Well now that's not really fair, is it?
Thanks, Acee - too bad.
Very much a fan of creation of LSR. Sad that it meant moving from
two underused WG meetings to one WG meeting that does not have enough
time for new work. Reminds me of TSVWG. *sigh*
Well, i guess all i am left with is to ask LSR WG members to attend TEAS
on monday and
Hi Toerless,
Unfortunately, we have a very full agenda already and are not taking additional
presentation for IETF 101. Additionally, you're going to need to present it in
TEAS anyway due to their mandate...
Thanks,
Acee
On 3/6/18, 4:56 PM, "Lsr on behalf of Toerless Eckert"