Re: [LTP] Git tree for ltp-devel?

Nate, Pardon me for being a git newb, but if the git tree is an import of the CVS tree available from ltp via sourceforce, are the labels preserved? I ask because I'm trying to reduce the amount of required merging between the version that I have (now 3 months old) and the cur

Re: [LTP] New LTP test feature [Hard Real Time Linux Testing]

Darren/others, any comments? We wish you send us a feedback in order to automate HRT test suitable for LTP and start the integration. Best regards. Christian 2008/7/3 Subrata Modak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Thank you Luca for that wonderful explanation of the work that you are > doing. Meanwhile,

[LTP] Where is struct FTW defined?

It's not standard, and is used in the nftw syscalls test but I can't seem to find where it's actually defined... Does anyone know? -Garrett - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] selinux-testsuite file sigiotask testcase patch for non refpolicies

On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 23:25 -0300, Ramon de Carvalho Valle wrote: > The attached patch fixes the following issue: > > The selinux-testsuite file sigiotask testcase (run as test_fileop_t) > needs rw permission to terminals to proceed its execution, which is not > allowed by the non refpolicies pro

Re: [LTP] Check for orphaned process groups

On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 10:28 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote: > Hi all, > > I was wondering whether the code that checks for orphaned process groups > in pan/pan.c is strictly necessary? Any orphaned process groups are > handled by the init process, so is there any need to try interrupting > the processe

Re: [LTP] Crackerjack and Linux Test Project

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Subrata Modak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Hisashi San, > > Since we have already embarked on our path to mutual co-operation in > Linux testing and test cases development, i would like to discuss some > of my ideas, which i think is capable of adding shot-in-

Re: [LTP] Check for orphaned process groups

On Jul 15 18:04, Subrata Modak wrote: > On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 10:28 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote: > > I was wondering whether the code that checks for orphaned process groups > > in pan/pan.c is strictly necessary? Any orphaned process groups are > > handled by the init process, so is there any need t

Re: [LTP] Git tree for ltp-devel?

On Jul 15 01:45, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Pardon me for being a git newb, but if the git tree is an import of > the CVS tree available from ltp via sourceforce, are the labels > preserved? Which labels are you talking about? The names of each commit? That's the magic of the way git work

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] selinux-testsuite file sigiotask testcase patch for non refpolicies

Thanks Subrata. Sorry, I forgot to keep you guys in CC. Best regards, On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 18:00 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 23:25 -0300, Ramon de Carvalho Valle wrote: > > The attached patch fixes the following issue: > > > > The selinux-testsuite file sigiotask testc

Re: [LTP] Git tree for ltp-devel?

On Jul 15, 2008, at 5:46 AM, Nate Straz wrote: > On Jul 15 01:45, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> Pardon me for being a git newb, but if the git tree is an import of >> the CVS tree available from ltp via sourceforce, are the labels >> preserved? > > Which labels are you talking about? The snapshot

Re: [LTP] Where is struct FTW defined?

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 3:53 AM, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's not standard, and is used in the nftw syscalls test but I can't > seem to find where it's actually defined... > > Does anyone know? > > -Garrett Scratch that. It's a documented structure in ftw... Not sure why the s

Re: [LTP] Crackerjack and Linux Test Project

>> For this to happen, we need to make our test cases ready when the >> corresponding kernel features are in -mm tree. Let me know your ideas on >> this. > > > Part of the problem here is knowing when interface changes have occurred. > Seeing new system calls in a release is easy. But, for the proj

Re: [LTP] Git tree for ltp-devel?

On Jul 15 08:25, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Jul 15, 2008, at 5:46 AM, Nate Straz wrote: > > >On Jul 15 01:45, Garrett Cooper wrote: > >>Pardon me for being a git newb, but if the git tree is an import of > >>the CVS tree available from ltp via sourceforce, are the labels > >>preserved? > > > >

Re: [LTP] Crackerjack and Linux Test Project

Subrata, Michael, Thank you for proposing. ideas >> The idea is to submit the test cases to LTP, for certain kernel >> features, which makes its way through the kernel-mm tree. When a >> developer submits his/her feature to mm-kernel, he gives a specification >> of the features. Depending on the

Re: [LTP] Fw: Bug in LTP

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:29:35PM +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 07:59 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > Someone has to have seen this already, but just in case... > > > > LTP fails to build on systems for which /bin/sh really is an old-style > > Bourne shell (which by the w