Re: [Ltsp-discuss] The Dark Ages

2010-01-13 Thread james
On Tuesday 12 January 2010 23:35:52 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote: Is there a trick to getting the lts.conf parameters recognised. This is a shot in the dark, but I had a similar problem, where the log was showing EDID info with correct resolutions, but my thin client

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Multiple netcards in one LTSP server, how...

2010-01-13 Thread Verner Kjærsgaard
Alkis Georgopoulos skrev: Στις 12-01-2010, ημέρα Τρι, και ώρα 22:39 +0100, ο/η Verner Kjærsgaard έγραψε: Well, I've not got 100 clients but someting like 70 or so. They don't run at the same time, perhaps 20 - 20 are active at the same time. The swithes in use are 24 port swithes, hence

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] 64 bit and i386

2010-01-13 Thread Marius Flage
Den 07.01.2010 15:38, skrev joe auerbach: Was that a bad idea? Should I have just installed the default version and been done with it? The whole point of reinstalling was to get the speed up. It looks better on the workstation, but did I just screw myself by installing the same version of

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Multiple netcards in one LTSP server, how...

2010-01-13 Thread Alkis Georgopoulos
Στις 13-01-2010, ημέρα Τετ, και ώρα 09:05 +0100, ο/η Verner Kjærsgaard έγραψε: - thank you for all answers! - one quick Q though... Try the 4 different subnets approach...yes, I understand howto fix the dhcpd.conf file in order to do this. But I'm unsure about lts.conf? In this file, only

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] [kiwi-ltsp][SOLVED] Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: unable to mount fs on unknown-block (3, 1)

2010-01-13 Thread CyberOrg
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Donny Christiaan dchristi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi J, After plug-in the 3Com 3c905c-tx network card ... IT WORKS LIKE A CHARM :)) So, the problem is just on the network module ... So back to one of my question: Boot up client using live CD and get this

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Multiple netcards in one LTSP server, how...

2010-01-13 Thread Verner Kjærsgaard
Alkis Georgopoulos skrev: Στις 13-01-2010, ημέρα Τετ, και ώρα 09:05 +0100, ο/η Verner Kjærsgaard έγραψε: - thank you for all answers! - one quick Q though... Try the 4 different subnets approach...yes, I understand howto fix the dhcpd.conf file in order to do this. But I'm unsure about

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Multiple netcards in one LTSP server, how...

2010-01-13 Thread Alkis Georgopoulos
Στις 13-01-2010, ημέρα Τετ, και ώρα 11:04 +0100, ο/η Verner Kjærsgaard έγραψε: Hi list and Alkis, - your latest idea with the 8-port gigabit switch sound REALLY nice! - to fully understand...I would then BOND the 4 server ports together and hook them up to 4 ports of the

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Multiple netcards in one LTSP server, how...(SOLVED)

2010-01-13 Thread Verner Kjærsgaard
Alkis Georgopoulos skrev: Στις 13-01-2010, ημέρα Τετ, και ώρα 11:04 +0100, ο/η Verner Kjærsgaard έγραψε: Hi list and Alkis, - your latest idea with the 8-port gigabit switch sound REALLY nice! - to fully understand...I would then BOND the 4 server ports together and hook them up to 4

[Ltsp-discuss] remote desktop to the actual ltsp server

2010-01-13 Thread Evan Ingram
hi there haven't got a monitor or keyboard attached to the actual server but i'd like to do some bits on it. figured i'd be able to just remote into it by ssh'ing in with -X and running vino-preferences to enable remote desktop, then just using vncviewer. all fine until running vncviewer, i just

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] remote desktop to the actual ltsp server

2010-01-13 Thread CyberOrg
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Evan Ingram evan.ing...@cariss.co.uk wrote: hi there haven't got a monitor or keyboard attached to the actual server but i'd like to do some bits on it. figured i'd be able to just remote into it by ssh'ing in with -X and running vino-preferences to enable

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] remote desktop to the actual ltsp server

2010-01-13 Thread Evan Ingram
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 11:47 +, Evan Ingram wrote: ~$ vncviewer 10.20.3.13:0 Connected to RFB server, using protocol version 3.7 and then nothing happens. bit more on this... that was when a user account was logged into ltsp. with no logins i get: ~$ vncviewer 10.20.3.13 vncviewer:

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] remote desktop to the actual ltsp server

2010-01-13 Thread Evan Ingram
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 17:23 +0530, CyberOrg wrote: When you work on any LTSP client you are actually working _on_the_server_ already. how come things are different if i log in physically on the server though? such as users and groups. if i log in as admin on the box itself i can authorise and

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] remote desktop to the actual ltsp server

2010-01-13 Thread Jakob Unterwurzacher
~$ vncviewer 10.20.3.13:0 Connected to RFB server, using protocol version 3.7 and then nothing happens. i've definitely disabled the confirm each access option so it shouldnt be popping up with an authorise access box on the server. Hmm. When you use ssh -X something this will only spawn

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] remote desktop to the actual ltsp server

2010-01-13 Thread David Burgess
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Jakob Unterwurzacher jakob...@gmail.com wrote: Anyway, the workaround is I was able to get access via VNC tunneled through SSH by changing the following settings in policykit. You can do it locally via Authorizations, or you can do it remotely using sudo

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] remote desktop to the actual ltsp server

2010-01-13 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi, Am Mittwoch, den 13.01.2010, 13:42 +0100 schrieb Jakob Unterwurzacher: Hmm. When you use ssh -X something this will only spawn one window but not the whole desktop. we used to do: ssh -X u...@server gnome-session in the very first iterations of LTSP5 development, that should still work

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] remote desktop to the actual ltsp server

2010-01-13 Thread Jordan Erickson
I've got a wiki page up for Ubuntu setups (sure it's portable to other dists) for exactly this - check it out: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuLTSP/GDMVNCInetdssh Cheers, Jordan Oliver Grawert wrote: hi, Am Mittwoch, den 13.01.2010, 13:42 +0100 schrieb Jakob Unterwurzacher: Hmm.

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] 64 bit and i386

2010-01-13 Thread james
On Wednesday 13 January 2010 22:59:40 ltsp-discuss- requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote: Was that a bad idea? Should I have just installed the default version and been done with it? The whole point of reinstalling was to get the speed up. It looks better on the workstation, but did I just

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] The Dark Ages

2010-01-13 Thread james
Hi Gadi, I really appreciate the help, and I'm not complaining, I'm just frustrated by my 2/3 tries at a thin client failing. The documentation advises XRANDR_MODE_ instead, but that wont have any effect unless X_VIRTUAL or X_VIRTUAL_AUTO are correctly set and then it sets the virtual

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] 64 bit and i386

2010-01-13 Thread james
On Thursday 14 January 2010 08:42:42 you wrote: On Wednesday 13 January 2010 22:59:40 ltsp-discuss- requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote: Was that a bad idea? Should I have just installed the default version and been done with it? The whole point of reinstalling was to get the speed

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] [kiwi-ltsp][SOLVED] Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: unable to mount fs on unknown-block (3, 1)

2010-01-13 Thread Donny Christiaan
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 4:02 PM, CyberOrg jigish.go...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Donny Christiaan dchristi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi J, After plug-in the 3Com 3c905c-tx network card ... IT WORKS LIKE A CHARM :)) So, the problem is just on the network module ... So