Hi all
i replace a syscall function address of sys_write by my_own_write function
using an LKM module as follow:
xchg(sys_call_table[__NR_write],my_own_write);
In the normal case the content of sys_call_table[__NR_write] address
changes and it displays the address of my_own_write , i verify
Hi,
I recently tried the new save/load feature and I have some feedback I'd
like to share.
My understanding was that I could create some kind of profile for
complex tracing setups. Lttngtop is a good example, because we have a
specific set of events and contexts to enable (to avoid doing -k -a).
--
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 11:54:02 -0400
From: Julien Desfossez jdesfos...@efficios.com
[...]
Everything went fine (except for the already known bug of all the contexts
information not recorded in the XML file). As expected,
--
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 18:21:29 +0200
From: Gerlando Falauto gerlando.fala...@keymile.com
I'm still struggling to figure out why, depending on how I compile
and link my application, I can get either custom tracepoint
--
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 18:21:29 +0200
From: Gerlando Falauto gerlando.fala...@keymile.com
I'm still struggling to figure out why, depending on how I compile and link
my application, I can get either custom tracepoint
On 05/23/2014 05:11 PM, Thibault, Daniel wrote:
--
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 18:21:29 +0200
From: Gerlando Falauto gerlando.fala...@keymile.com
I'm still struggling to figure out why, depending on how I compile and link my
Hi,
I'm still struggling to figure out why, depending on how I compile and
link my application, I can get either custom tracepoint providers OR
tracef() to work, but not both at the same time.
Is there any documentation explaining how lttng-ust is roughly supposed
to work?
(i.e. linking
* Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org
To: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 11:14:03 AM
Subject: [lttng-dev] [lttng-tools] build failure on armel (debian)
Hey guys,
This bug
Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] [lttng-tools] build failure on armel (debian)
* Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org
To: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 11:14:03 AM
Subject: [lttng
Hi,
following up on my own mail:
On 05/15/2014 07:39 PM, Gerlando Falauto wrote:
[...]
If I put an additional tracef() call exactly where my tracepoint is
located, this gets traced without a problem. So the infrastructure
should be all working in my opinion.
I repeated my test by compiling
Hi,
I created a simple tracepoint following the examples within lttng-ust
documentation. The .C source (travcepoint provider) and header files are
generated by means of the lttng-gen-tp helper script and then compiled
and linked manually within the application.
However, my tracepoints are
- Original Message -
From: Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org
To: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 11:14:03 AM
Subject: [lttng-dev] [lttng-tools] build failure on armel (debian)
Hey guys,
This bug¹ was filed recently:
your package no longer builds
Hey guys,
This bug¹ was filed recently:
your package no longer builds on the armel buildds:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ltt-controlarch=armelver=2.4.1-1stamp=1397064419
CC rculfhash.lo
/tmp/ccBG89vh.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccBG89vh.s:1105:
Using a fresh Eclipse C/C++ environment (Kepler 4.3.2), what's the best way
to load the LTTng git source tree? Cloning the git.lttng.org lttng-ust master
branch (for example) is easy, my problem is in getting the Autotools to kick in
properly. Eclipse's array of options is somewhat
Gouvernement du Canada | Government of Canada
http://www.valcartier.drdc-rddc.gc.ca/
___
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
___
lttng-dev
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:57:34 -0400
From: Marc-André Laperle marc-andre.lape...@ericsson.com
On 14-04-30 11:48 AM, Thibault, Daniel wrote:
File: Import...
[Import]
Git Projects from Git
(Next)
[...]
[Cloning from http://git.lttng.org/lttng-ust.git: Select a wizard to use
for
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 12:32:18PM -0400, Jérémie Galarneau wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Jan Glauber jan.glau...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes:
$ which arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc
/usr/bin/arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc
IIRC the examples have not been build by default in the past, right?
They
Hi list,
I get a compile error with current git head of lttng-ust if I cross-compile
(bitbake):
| make[4]: Entering directory
`/home/jang/temp/p4/JGlauber_hal_share/poky/build/tmp/work/armv7ahf-vfp-neon-elina-linux-gnueabi/lttng-ust-2.4-r0/git/doc/examples/demo-tracef'
|
Hi Jan,
Can you post the errors you get if you set the CC=gcc line in
demo-tracef/Makefile by
ifdef AM_CC
CC = $(AM_CC)
endif
Regards,
Jérémie
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Jan Glauber jan.glau...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi list,
I get a compile error with current git head of lttng-ust if I
Sure, it looks like there is a problem with python in lttng-get-tp:
| make[4]: Entering directory
`/home/jang/temp/p4/JGlauber_hal_share/poky/build/tmp/work/armv7ahf-vfp-neon-elina-linux-gnueabi/lttng-ust-2.4-r0/git/doc/examples/gen-tp'
| ../../../tools/lttng-gen-tp -o sample_tracepoint.c
--
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 13:43:21 +0200
From: Jan Glauber jan.glau...@gmail.com
I get a compile error with current git head of lttng-ust if I cross-compile
(bitbake):
| make[4]: Entering directory
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Jan Glauber jan.glau...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure, it looks like there is a problem with python in lttng-get-tp:
| make[4]: Entering directory
Yes:
$ which arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc
/usr/bin/arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc
IIRC the examples have not been build by default in the past, right?
2014-04-07 16:20 GMT+02:00 Jérémie Galarneau jeremie.galarn...@efficios.com
:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Jan Glauber jan.glau...@gmail.com
wrote:
hi all:
I cross compile below elements for arm successfully.
1. userspace-rcu-0.8.4
2. popt-1.16
3. lttng-ust-2.3.2
4. lttng-tools-2.3.2
5. lttng-modules-2.4.0
I follow execution steps:
1. lttng-sessiond -vvv
2. ps (to check whether lttng-sessiond execute successfully)
3. lttng -vvv create
: 04/06/2014 03:07 PM
Subject:[lttng-dev] lttng has No session daemon is available
hi all:
I cross compile below elements for arm successfully.
1. userspace-rcu-0.8.4
2. popt-1.16
3. lttng-ust-2.3.2
4. lttng-tools-2.3.2
5. lttng-modules-2.4.0
I follow execution steps:
1. lttng-sessiond -vvv
On 20 Mar (13:54:55), Gerlando Falauto wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to bring lttng-tools up to date, but I get the following message:
lttng-sessiond: ht-cleanup.c:92: thread_ht_cleanup: Assertion `pollfd ==
ht_cleanup_pipe[0]' failed.
I noticed this was already filed as a bug:
hi all
i use below configure command to cross-compile lttng-tool
./configure --disable-static --host=arm-v7a8v4r3-linux-gnueabi
CPPFLAGS=-I/media/sdb2/toolchain/arm/arm-v7a8v4r3-20131011/arm-v7a8v4r3-linux-gnueabi/sys-root/include
hi all:
2014-03-27 17:04 GMT+08:00 loody milo...@gmail.com:
hi all
i use below configure command to cross-compile lttng-tool
./configure --disable-static --host=arm-v7a8v4r3-linux-gnueabi
CPPFLAGS=-I/media/sdb2/toolchain/arm/arm-v7a8v4r3-20131011/arm-v7a8v4r3-linux-gnueabi/sys-root/include
Hi David,
I'm getting linker errors for lttng-tools, due to an older version of
liburcu (0.7) installed. Now I was looking for a configure switch to
specify where the liburcu that should be used is but I didn't find one.
Would it be possible to add something like --with-xml-prefix= but for
With this patch it works for me, but I'm no autoconf wizard and I just realized
I also could use:
./configure --disable-lttng-ust --with-lttng-ust-prefix=/usr/local/
to make it work since all I need is the additional -L path...
--Jan
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index
The following patch series in LTTng-ust add support of the named CTF structures
global type. It goes along with a patch series in LTTng-tools.
It is built above the CTF enumerations patches proposed earlier and being
staged in Mathieu Desnoyers's development branch here:
Hi,
I'm trying to bring lttng-tools up to date, but I get the following message:
lttng-sessiond: ht-cleanup.c:92: thread_ht_cleanup: Assertion `pollfd ==
ht_cleanup_pipe[0]' failed.
I noticed this was already filed as a bug:
http://redmine.dorsal.polymtl.ca/issues/747
I tried implementing
LTTNG_HEALTH_APP_MANAGE:
The lttng-health-check function will report the health of the application
command socket manager subsystem. This session daemon thread
(thread_manage_apps) watches the application command sockets; their closure
indicates application shutdown (more accurately, shutdown
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Thibault, Daniel
daniel.thiba...@drdc-rddc.gc.ca wrote:
LTTNG_HEALTH_APP_MANAGE:
The lttng-health-check function will report the health of the application
command socket manager subsystem. This session daemon thread
(thread_manage_apps) watches the
- Original Message -
From: Santiago Font sf...@teldat.com
To: Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com
Cc: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 8:22:55 PM
Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] LTTng-ust 2.4.0-rc2: no events when tracing busybox
Hi
Trying to update today, I got this problem using the daily PPA:
Unpacking liblttng-ust-ctl2:amd64 (from
.../liblttng-ust-ctl2_2.5~pre+bzr1743+pack50+201403102058~ubuntu13.10.1_amd64.deb)
...
dpkg: error processing
- Original Message -
From: Santiago Font sf...@teldat.com
To: Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com
Cc: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 6:12:10 PM
Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] LTTng-ust 2.4.0-rc2: no events when tracing busybox
Hi,
As I
: Santiago Font sf...@teldat.com
To: Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com
Cc: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 6:12:10 PM
Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] LTTng-ust 2.4.0-rc2: no events when tracing busybox
Hi,
As I mentioned, I'm building OpenWRT, therefore, part
Hi,
I have an embedded scenario (openwrt over Freescale) working with
LTTng:
lttng create TEST
lttng enable-channel MYCHAN -u --buffers-uid --subbuf-size 64k
lttng add-context -u -t procname -c MYCHAN
lttng enable-event -u * -c MYCHAN
lttng start
2:28:11 PM
Subject: [lttng-dev] LTTng-ust 2.4.0-rc2: no events when tracing busybox
Hi,
I have an embedded scenario (openwrt over Freescale) working with
LTTng:
lttng create TEST
lttng enable-channel MYCHAN -u --buffers-uid --subbuf-size 64k
lttng add-context
Hi David,
On 03/03/2014 11:24 PM, David OShea wrote:
Hi all,
Apologies if this is a stupid question, but is the “ip” context meant to
be used with LTTng-UST? I tried it out, and the address in the field
pointed to the TRACEPOINT_EVENT definition in my header file, i.e. not
to the
Hi all,
Apologies if this is a stupid question, but is the ip context meant to be
used with LTTng-UST? I tried it out, and the address in the field pointed to
the TRACEPOINT_EVENT definition in my header file, i.e. not to the tracepoint()
call site. Could this be due to the fact that I use
---
src/bin/lttng/commands/version.c |6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/bin/lttng/commands/version.c b/src/bin/lttng/commands/version.c
index bd88659..2b41b05 100644
--- a/src/bin/lttng/commands/version.c
+++ b/src/bin/lttng/commands/version.c
@@
Merged! Thanks
On 25 Feb (13:04:17), Jonathan Rajotte wrote:
---
src/bin/lttng/commands/version.c |6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/bin/lttng/commands/version.c
b/src/bin/lttng/commands/version.c
index bd88659..2b41b05 100644
---
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 21:15:42 -0500
From: Jessica Foest jessica.fo...@gmail.com
is there a document that explain the meaning of fields displayed in the
traces generated by babeltrace ?
an example :
[19:52:06.617756425] *(+0.01667)* workstation sys_splice: { cpu_id = 3
}, {
/lttng-dev
___
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com
---
doc/Makefile.am |2 +-
doc/valgrind-howto.txt |4
src/common/hashtable/rculfhash.c |2 +-
src/common/runas.c | 16 +++-
4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3
Issues found with Valgrind:
- Uninitialized memory sent through sendmsg,
- Uninitialized realloc memory,
- Erroneous pointer arithmetic in jul_list_events(),
- Memory leaks in kernel_consumer_add_channel(),
kernel_consumer_add_metadata(),
- Memory leak (snapshot_destroy missing hash table
Hi all
is there a document that explain the meaning of fields displayed in the
traces generated by babeltrace ?
an example :
[19:52:06.617756425] *(+0.01667)* workstation sys_splice: { cpu_id = 3
}, { perf_branches = 418157709, perf_branch_instructions = 418156946,
perf_cache_misses =
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Jessica Foest jessica.fo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
is there a document that explain the meaning of fields displayed in the
traces generated by babeltrace ?
an example :
[19:52:06.617756425] (+0.01667) workstation sys_splice: { cpu_id = 3 },
{
Thanks a lot.
2014-02-20 21:28 GMT-05:00 Jérémie Galarneau jeremie.galarn...@efficios.com
:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Jessica Foest jessica.fo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all
is there a document that explain the meaning of fields displayed in the
traces generated by babeltrace ?
Hi Santiago,
it looks like uClibc does not have proper support for dlinfo().
You have two options:
Switch to a different C library suitable for embedded systems that does
have proper support for dlinfo(): http://www.eglibc.org/home
Build without liblttng-ust-dl (simply remove it from the list
I made the corrections to the patches.
___
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
I made the corrections to the patches and added a regression test for events
with tracepoints using global type declarations.
___
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
/
--
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 21:10:00 + (UTC)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com
To: lttng-dev lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Subject: [lttng-dev] [RELEASE] LTTng-UST 2.4.0-rc1
Message-ID:
661952664.68956.1384549800533.javamail.zim...@efficios.com
- Original Message -
From: David Goulet dgou...@efficios.com
To: Jim Dumont jim.dum...@ericsson.com
Cc: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2014 12:17:36 PM
Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] lttng-dev Digest, Vol 67, Issue 48
On 17 Jan (17:26:13), Jim Dumont wrote:
Hi
...@voxpopuli.im
Cc: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 1:00:44 AM
Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] Lttng state dump traces not present in 13.04 Ubuntu
server distribution
Yes, they do appear in lttng list -k event list.
Regards,
Krish.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Alexandre
- Original Message -
From: Geneviève Bastien gbastien+lt...@versatic.net
To: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 3:07:21 PM
Subject: [lttng-dev] LTTng-tools: Add support of named metadata and CTF
enumerations
The following patch series in LTTng-tools add
Hi,
I have confirmed that the lttng-modules-dkms package was successfully
installed.
$ cat /usr/src/lttng-modules-2.3.x+stable/ChangeLog | head -4
2013-09-28 LTTng modules 2.3.2
* Blacklist kernels 3.10.13 and 3.11.2
I have even confirmed with few debug printk's in lttng_statedump.ko that
Hmm, ok, if you use lttng list -k do they appear in the list of
available events?
One other thing I can think about is that the statedump itself takes a
little bit of time to execute, so the statedump events are never at the
very start of the trace. So if your traces are very short it's possible
The following patch series in LTTng-ust add support of named CTF metadata in
tracepoints, and add support of enumerations fields.
This series goes with another patch series in LTTng-tools. This series'
patch 5 needs the LTTng-tools patch series.
Filters do not work yet for enumeration fields.
The following patch series in LTTng-tools add support of named metadata
in tracepoints, and add the statedump in metadata of named CTF
enumerations.
This series goes with another patch series in LTTng-ust. Patch 1 works
with LTTng-ust master, but the other patches require LTTng-ust's series
Dear All,
Recently when I tried to use lttng on Ubuntu 13.04 server distribution, I
noticed that statedump traces were not present.
Installed lttng-tools, lttng-modules-dkms, babeltrace from
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/lttng/ppa/ubuntu raring main
deb-src
@lists.lttng.org
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
___
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
/
--
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 21:10:00 + (UTC)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com
To: lttng-dev lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Subject: [lttng-dev] [RELEASE] LTTng-UST 2.4.0-rc1
Message-ID:
661952664.68956.1384549800533.javamail.zim...@efficios.com
Content
Trail 2:
[...]
lttng@/ # lttng -g lttng create as
Session as created.
Traces will be written in /home/lttng/lttng-traces/as-20131224-123811
lttng@/ # lttng -g lttng enable-event -k -u -a
All kernel events are enabled in channel channel0
This is the culprit. lttng enable-event
I tried different possibility to generate the userspace trace and kernel
trace and observed that I'm not able to generate the user space tracing If
the lttng-sessiond is started
using root user.
I'm using busybox in my custom Linux platform and no sudo support. It's a 64
bit machine.
Hi All,
Here are some queries i have. Can someone please help me with them.
1) is there a way send selective traces from lttng to syslog; and should be
configurable based on the priority. (say like i want to send all CRIT or
EMRG traces to syslog)
2) is there a way to stdout the logs of lttng.
Greetings,
I've created the stable-2.4 branch from master even though the tree is
still in the RC cycle. This is to be able to push patches for 2.5 in the
master tree.
So please, if you are using master as the upstream reference to test
2.4-rc*, change it to the stable-2.4 branch.
As a
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:09:50 +0800
I tried with David's instruction and the logs are attached. Still the trace
files are not generated for the easy-ust example.
I tried both --verboseconsumer and --consumerd64-path options for running the
lttng-sessiond and the relevant logs are
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:42 AM, Manikandan Govindaswamy
ma...@vestas.com wrote:
Hi !,
I’m also able to run the easy-ust and generate the traces successfully if I
create and run from an user not as root user.
But the kernel traces are generated fine for even root user but for ust it
Hi !,
I'm also able to run the easy-ust and generate the traces successfully if I
create and run from an user not as root user.
But the kernel traces are generated fine for even root user but for ust it
runs fine only with non-root user in my case.
And the behavior is vice versa if I
@lists.lttng.org
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
___
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
/lttng-tools/src'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
Thank you
Skumar
___
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
___
lttng-dev
Hello all,
We'll have a unofficial Hack-day on thursday December 12 at
Polytechnique in Montréal, for those interested. We'll work on LTTng
and TMF features, get feedback on new features, most of which are
available in the experimental Tmf RCP, announced previously in october
(available at
On 27 Nov (15:37:10), kumar s wrote:
Hi,
I am getting non dynamic relocation error while trying to build
lttng-tools. I have configured the lttng-tools for mips-gcc.
Making all in lttng-sessiond
make[3]: Entering directory
`/home/shkumar/lttng-tools/lttng-tools/src/bin/lttng-sessiond'
Hi,
I am getting non dynamic relocation error while trying to build
lttng-tools. I have configured the lttng-tools for mips-gcc.
Making all in src
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/shkumar/lttng-tools/lttng-tools/src'
Making all in common
make[2]: Entering directory
Also the magic becomes a uint32_t instead of 6 chars for more aligned
reads.
Signed-off-by: Julien Desfossez jdesfos...@efficios.com
---
src/bin/lttng-relayd/index.h | 2 +-
src/bin/lttng-relayd/live.c | 12 +++---
src/bin/lttng-relayd/lttng-relayd.h |
Signed-off-by: Raphaël Beamonte raphael.beamo...@gmail.com
---
src/common/utils.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/common/utils.c b/src/common/utils.c
index 3a4f850..330c04e 100644
--- a/src/common/utils.c
+++ b/src/common/utils.c
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ char
Signed-off-by: Raphaël Beamonte raphael.beamo...@gmail.com
---
tests/unit/test_utils_expand_path.c |2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/unit/test_utils_expand_path.c
b/tests/unit/test_utils_expand_path.c
index 6b809b8..65582ff 100644
---
Cases where the path given ended with '/.' or '/..' were not handled
properly using the utils_expand_path function and the resulting path
was still showing this end part. This fix aims to treat that last
part and 'expand' it as expected.
Signed-off-by: Raphaël Beamonte raphael.beamo...@gmail.com
* Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org wrote:
* Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org
To: Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com
Cc: Stéphane Graber stgra...@ubuntu.com, Alexandre Montplaisir
: [lttng-dev] LTTng packages in Debian sid out of sync
* Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org wrote:
* Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org
To: Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com
Cc: Stéphane
Add copyright notice.
Remove extern C guard with respect to #597.
Signed-off-by: Zifei Tong soar...@gmail.com
---
tests/benchmark/tp.c | 24
tests/benchmark/ust_tests_benchmark.h | 28 +---
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 7
- Original Message -
From: Zifei Tong soar...@gmail.com
To: mathieu desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com
Cc: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org, Zifei Tong soar...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 10:04:55 AM
Subject: [lttng-ust PATCH] Fix tests/benchmark
Add copyright notice.
On 14 Nov (19:58:30), Raphaël Beamonte wrote:
David,
Following the discussions we had on IRC with Mathieu and the last
mail exchange, here is a series of patch that should answer to our
enquiries.
The first two patches are linked to the utils_expand_path unit test
and correct its
- Original Message -
From: Raphaël Beamonte raphael.beamo...@gmail.com
To: Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com
Cc: David Goulet dgou...@efficios.com, lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 10:27:03 PM
Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] [lttng-tools PATCH 3/4
Subject: [lttng-dev] [lttng-tools PATCH 3/4] Correct the behavior of the
utils_expand_path function
Even if the utils_expand_path function was intended to allow to
use unexistent directory paths, it was in fact only working for
some kind of arguments. Paths like foo, bar/ or bar/foo
Some comments...
- Original Message -
From: Raphaël Beamonte raphael.beamo...@gmail.com
To: dgou...@efficios.com
Cc: Raphaël Beamonte raphael.beamo...@gmail.com, lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 12:34:35 AM
Subject: [lttng-dev] [lttng-tools PATCH 1/4
2013/11/14 Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com:
Comments should start with a:
/*
* Then start of comment...
Right. Should I submit a new patch for that ?
There is no point in ending a with \0, it implicitly ends with a \0
already.
+
- Original Message -
From: Raphaël Beamonte raphael.beamo...@gmail.com
To: Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com
Cc: David Goulet dgou...@efficios.com, lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 11:00:12 AM
Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] [lttng-tools PATCH 3/4
2013/11/14 Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com:
We should document that this returns allocated memory which needs to be freed
by the caller.
Right.
Also, we should clearly state that the only reason why we implement this is
that realpath() only works on existing paths, which
...@ubuntu.com, Alexandre Montplaisir
alexmon...@voxpopuli.im,
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2013 10:21:50 AM
Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] LTTng packages in Debian sid out of sync
* Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
Hi Jon,
Thanks
David,
Following the discussions we had on IRC with Mathieu and the last
mail exchange, here is a series of patch that should answer to our
enquiries.
The first two patches are linked to the utils_expand_path unit test
and correct its behavior and the expected results (some input was
at first
Signed-off-by: Raphaël Beamonte raphael.beamo...@gmail.com
---
tests/unit/test_utils_expand_path.c |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/unit/test_utils_expand_path.c
b/tests/unit/test_utils_expand_path.c
index 27bfe8f..b79744b 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Raphaël Beamonte raphael.beamo...@gmail.com
---
tests/unit/test_utils_expand_path.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/unit/test_utils_expand_path.c
b/tests/unit/test_utils_expand_path.c
index b79744b..bb460a2 100644
---
As all of the work is now done in utils_partial_realpath and
utils_expand_path, utils_resolve_relative is not necessary
anymore and should be deleted from the sources.
Signed-off-by: Raphaël Beamonte raphael.beamo...@gmail.com
---
.gitignore |1 -
As most of the resolve-related work can now be done using
utils_partial_realpath, the utils_expand_path function can
call it and concentrate on resolving the relative paths in
the middle of a path string, such as '/./' and '/../'.
Signed-off-by: Raphaël Beamonte raphael.beamo...@gmail.com
---
alexmon...@voxpopuli.im,
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2013 10:21:50 AM
Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] LTTng packages in Debian sid out of sync
* Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
Hi Jon,
Thanks for the updates. Did you manage to get the upgrade path
* David Goulet dgou...@efficios.com wrote:
On 03 Nov (18:19:21), Jon Bernard wrote:
* Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org wrote:
* Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jon Bernard jbern...@debian.org
To: Mathieu Desnoyers
601 - 700 of 1165 matches
Mail list logo
