On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 02:16:43 PM Thijs Schreijer wrote:
>
> They are both "you can do whatever you want and get away with it licenses",
> but MIT is a clear legal statement, "public domain" is not. I think clear
> is better. If you don't want to provide "explicit legal clearance" so it
>
On 27.11.2012 21:50, Hisham wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who participated in this discussion, this must be
> the most civil licensing discussion I've ever seen. This makes me
> happy for our little community. :)
>
> Should we upload a revised 2.0-2 rockspec with an updated license field?
I've made
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
> By the way, I decided to use the same terms as lua, as suggested by
> Hisham. Someone who doesn't agree to these terms wouldn't be using the
> module in the first place.
>
> Sorry about making such a fuss about this, and thanks for the feed
Hi,
On 27.11.2012 20:16, Thijs Schreijer wrote:
> I don't favor one license over the other, they all serve their purpose. But
> I do prefer clarity.
Does adding the license to every single file in the distribution add to
clarity, or does the current notice suffice? I see some people (mostly
*BSD
On 27.11.2012 20:16, Thijs Schreijer wrote:
> They are both "you can do whatever you want and get away with it licenses",
> but MIT is a clear legal statement, "public domain" is not. I think clear is
> better. If you don't want to provide "explicit legal clearance" so it can't
> be used in proprie
> -Original Message-
> From: Hisham [mailto:h...@hisham.hm]
> Sent: dinsdag 27 november 2012 19:55
> To: luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Luarocks-developers] [ANN] bencode-2.0
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Thijs Schreijer
>
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Thijs Schreijer
wrote:
>>
>> Project homepage: http://bitbucket.org/wilhelmy/lua-bencode/
>>
>
> Minor remark; you mention "While not a license, all files in this repository
> have been placed in the public domain because the authors do not believe in
> intellectua
>
> Project homepage: http://bitbucket.org/wilhelmy/lua-bencode/
>
Minor remark; you mention "While not a license, all files in this repository
have been placed in the public domain because the authors do not believe in
intellectual property.", and while that may be a true statement, in practice
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 15:54:02 -0200, Elias Barrionovo wrote:
> Well, I have no idea what bencode is or does and your email doesn't
> provide any info with that. Also, it would be nice to have a link for
> your project and not just for the rockspec. ^^
My apologies!
I was way too excited t
Hello,
I'm pleased to announce the release of bencode-2.0, which I have been
putting off for way too long.
Excerpt from the release notes:
-- snip --
This is the second release of lua-bencode.
API Changes:
* Instead of throwing errors all over the place, nil and an error message
will be retur
10 matches
Mail list logo
