Hi again,
* So filemanager will be rewritten well its great.
*About the FN keys. I tested in ubuntu's Karmic koala with the FN+F12
sleep mode.. I had no problem with that... only the funny thing was I
realize the backlight was not flickering in LXDE like G-NOME.
*About Wicd I made a bug repo
To repond to the Gui interface for server.
I work daily as administrator, I have Ubuntu as internet/firewall
server. I think its easier with gui interface like LXDE. Because if I do
it in console I have to go to the forum again to get the instruction for
the setup and all that stuff and ofcour
Dear all,
below some info important info for lubuntu from the lxde mailing list.
Best,
Mario
-- Forwarded message --
From: PCMan
Date: Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:53 PM
Subject: [Lxde-list] New release of LXSession, lxde-common, and lxpanel
To: lxde-list
No new strings are adde
I agree with David. Also anyone who is performing these highly specialized
installations is certainly going to have the knowledge required to open the
command line and "sudo apt-get whatever gui or lack thereof" he/she wants.
n Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:26 PM, David Sugar wrote:
> I actually was no
I actually was not suggesting there should be such a remix. I was
suggesting however that one could potentially do this with mini-iso
install by selecting them explicitly at install time if we have lxde
desktop as a task in mini-iso. And yes, one could do a server install
and add lxde/lubuntu aft
Hello.
Just one thing I wanted to note: server GUI is a bad idea. If you want
server, you install server, if you want a workstation on low-grade hardware,
you install Lubuntu. If you have low-grade hardware to use as a server, you
definitely shouldn't be wasting the precious (and, oh, so limited!)
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Jeff Elkner wrote:
> Hi All,
> 1. Low income students who do not have computers at home.
> 2. "Free" older computers that I could give to them.
>
> The "free" computers vary, but they start at Pentium II or III
> processors with 128 MB or higher RAM.
> I would love
Thanks, Julien! I'll be able to install it on at least half a dozen
different computers, and report back what I find.
jeff elkner
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Julien Lavergne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks, testing and feedback are always welcome :)
> I hope we can have a first testing iso next w
Understood, David, but if the platform on which it is built is LTS,
then we know that the apt repositories will stay active for longer.
jeff
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:50 AM, David Sugar wrote:
> Ubuntu flavors are not LTS in the same way as Ubuntu itself. LTS I
> think has a specific meaning t
Hi,
Thanks for your feedback, let me try to answer some of your
questions/ideas :
> * Filemanager Pcman 0.5.1 on the left windows are drives displayed
> twice. if you click one of the with the same name you will get an
> error-message "Directory doesnt exist"
Pcmanfm will be rewrite for the ne
Hi,
Thanks, testing and feedback are always welcome :)
I hope we can have a first testing iso next week, some days after the
1st iso of Lucid. It can be a good starting point.
Regards,
Julien Lavergne
Le jeudi 10 décembre 2009 à 09:56 -0500, Jeff Elkner a écrit :
> Hi All,
>
> I super happy t
Le jeudi 10 décembre 2009 à 09:28 -0500, David Sugar a écrit :
> Ultimately I think mplayer is a problem, at least from the perspective
> of being an "official" variant, and especially with respect to codecs.
> That being said, I am also aware many will choose to install mplayer if
> it's not in th
Ubuntu flavors are not LTS in the same way as Ubuntu itself. LTS I
think has a specific meaning that implies with it Canonical paid support
as being valid for those who have service contracts for the same period,
and there is no Canonical paid support for Lubuntu or other community
spins. However
That is an interesting and excellent question. What is driving the
interest in Chromium for UNE ARM is entirely performance based vs
Firefox. Let me make a note on this on the lightweight browser blueprint...
Mario Behling wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> thanks a lot for your ideas.
>
> Do you have mor
Hi All,
I super happy to see working moving forward on Lubuntu. I teach
Information and Communication Technology classes in Arlington
Virginia. We have:
1. Low income students who do not have computers at home.
2. "Free" older computers that I could give to them.
The "free" computers vary, but
Hi David,
thanks a lot for your ideas.
Do you have more information on which Chromium version will be in the
Ubuntu repo? The reason why some people refrain from using Chromium
are privacy issues. An RLZ identifier, an encoded string is sent to
Google on search queries or every 24 hours with Chro
Mario Behling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for starting the work on Lucid. Can we update
>
> I agree, that we need to look out for lightweight options for applications.
>
> About the applications you are proposing.
>
> xfce task manager - I know that lxtask has some bugs, but we defined
> it in the
Ultimately I think mplayer is a problem, at least from the perspective
of being an "official" variant, and especially with respect to codecs.
That being said, I am also aware many will choose to install mplayer if
it's not in the default install, as I am aware many use medibuntu repos.
Leszek Lesn
This touches upon many areas. I will initially comment on a few. In
respect to SD cards and lower cost SSD media, I think there is a lot we
can do to better optimize the user experience, even from install time,
and perhaps Lubuntu is the right place to think about doing this first.
There is (nat
19 matches
Mail list logo