Re: IKVM (or rather OpenJDK) License Problem

Hi Stefan, * Java's bytecode doesn't contain metadata about generics and when Java is compiled, all info about generics gets lost. So, IKVMed Lucene.Net will have to live without generics. * IKVM is the java world in .NET runtime in fact. If you are , for ex, to write an analyzer, you have to

Re: IKVM (or rather OpenJDK) License Problem

Hi DIGY On 2011-01-28, digy digy wrote: * Java's bytecode doesn't contain metadata about generics and when Java is compiled, all info about generics gets lost. So, IKVMed Lucene.Net will have to live without generics. Ah, yes, the joys of type erasure. I completely missed that. * IKVM is

Re: IKVM (or rather OpenJDK) License Problem

* It's not possible to make custom changes in IKVMed Lucene.NET unless you make your changes in java sources and compile them. Wouldn't a custom change contradict the goal of a line-by-line translation? What I intented to say was customizations made by Lucene.Net users, not as a Lucene.Net

Quick recap of what's going on, please :)

Hi guys, I just subscribed to the dev list, and I think a lot is going on these days. Can someone do a very quick recap or point me to some doc with the status of the proposal? Thx Simone -- Simone Chiaretta Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz RSS:

Re: Quick recap of what's going on, please :)

The discussion about the proposal can be seen on the tread below, just search the page for [VOTE] Accept Lucene.Net for incubation http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201101.mbox/thread Cheers G On 28 Jan 2011, at 14:18, Simone Chiaretta wrote: Hi guys, I just