[jira] Closed: (LUCENENET-319) Graduate Apache Lucene.Net as sub-project under Apache Lucene

2011-01-28 Thread Digy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Digy closed LUCENENET-319. -- Resolution: Invalid > Graduate Apache Lucene.Net as sub-project under Apache Lucene > --

Re: Build & CI Considerations

2011-01-28 Thread Wyatt Barnett
Why do I forget to check against the obvious? Anyhow, I guess we can run with what we have, though that build is not doing much. Any idea how we get administrative access over there? Might as well try and get it to do stuff like run the tests as well. I think long-term, we'll need something a bit

Re: Quick recap of what's going on, please :)

2011-01-28 Thread Glyn Darkin
The discussion about the proposal can be seen on the tread below, just search the page for "[VOTE] Accept Lucene.Net for incubation" http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201101.mbox/thread Cheers G On 28 Jan 2011, at 14:18, Simone Chiaretta wrote: > Hi guys, > I just su

Re: Quick recap of what's going on, please :)

2011-01-28 Thread Simone Chiaretta
Wow 146 messages ... so basically now we are waiting for the gatekeepers to vote? Simone On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Robert Jordan wrote: > On 28.01.2011 15:18, Simone Chiaretta wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> I just subscribed to the dev list, and I think a lot is going on these >> days. >> >> C

Quick recap of what's going on, please :)

2011-01-28 Thread Simone Chiaretta
Hi guys, I just subscribed to the dev list, and I think a lot is going on these days. Can someone do a very quick recap or point me to some doc with the status of the proposal? Thx Simone -- Simone Chiaretta Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz RSS: http://feeds2.f

Stack overflow now lucent powered

2011-01-28 Thread Wyatt Barnett
And they are publicly asking how they can help. http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2011/01/stack-overflow-search-now-81-less-crappy/

Re: IKVM (or rather OpenJDK) License Problem

2011-01-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-01-28, digy digy wrote: >>> * It's not possible to make custom changes in IKVMed Lucene.NET >>> unless you make your changes in java sources and compile them. >> Wouldn't a "custom change" contradict the goal of a line-by-line >> translation? > What I intented to say was customizations

Re: IKVM (or rather OpenJDK) License Problem

2011-01-28 Thread digy digy
>> * It's not possible to make custom changes in IKVMed Lucene.NET unless you >> make your changes in java sources and compile them. > Wouldn't a "custom change" contradict the goal of a line-by-line > translation? What I intented to say was customizations made by Lucene.Net users, not as a Luc

Re: IKVM (or rather OpenJDK) License Problem

2011-01-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi DIGY On 2011-01-28, digy digy wrote: > * Java's bytecode doesn't contain metadata about generics and when Java is > compiled, all info about generics gets lost. So, IKVMed Lucene.Net will have > to live without generics. Ah, yes, the joys of type erasure. I completely missed that. > * IKVM

Re: IKVM (or rather OpenJDK) License Problem

2011-01-28 Thread digy digy
Hi Stefan, * Java's bytecode doesn't contain metadata about generics and when Java is compiled, all info about generics gets lost. So, IKVMed Lucene.Net will have to live without generics. * IKVM is the java world in .NET runtime in fact. If you are , for ex, to write an analyzer, you have to ov