Excellent Idea - I'll do that monday to give you guys the weekend to do any
last minute code cleaning you want.
> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 19:30:02 +0300
> Subject: Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3
> From: ita...@code972.com
> T
Prescott - we could make an RC and push it to Nuget as a PreRelease, to get
real feedback.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> I don't think we ever fully adopted the style guidelines, probably not a
> terrible discussion to have. As for this release, I think that by lazy
> c
The point is to make the code better, not to satisfy R# :)
The main benefit of this process is marking fields as readonly, finding
code paths with stupid behavior and moving simple aggregations to use LINQ.
I don't apply the LINQ syntax to a non-trivial operations, to make it
easier to keep track
gt; From: geobmx...@hotmail.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3
> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:13:12 -0700
>
> I don't think we ever fully adopted the style guidelines, probably not a
> terrible discussion to have. As for thi
I would like to pitch into this effort and put my ReSharper license to use. I
pulled down trunk, and picked a yellow item at random, and started to dig in. I
quickly generated more questions than answers, realized I needed to stop
munging code and consult the wiki and list archives. After diggin
fork it and git r done? I couldn't resist. +1 for git.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
> Nowadays git works just great for Windows, and it's much easier to work
> with than Hg
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Zachary Gramana >wrote:
>
> > On Aug 1, 2012, at 12:51 P
Nowadays git works just great for Windows, and it's much easier to work
with than Hg
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Zachary Gramana wrote:
> On Aug 1, 2012, at 12:51 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
>
> > And for heaven's sake, can we move to git when graduating?
>
> Given that we're a .NET-focused
with svn.
> Subject: Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3
> From: zgram...@feature23.com
> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 14:41:28 -0400
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> On Aug 1, 2012, at 12:51 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
>
> > And for heaven's sake, can we move
On Aug 1, 2012, at 12:51 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
> And for heaven's sake, can we move to git when graduating?
Given that we're a .NET-focused community, and many of us are likely primarily
using Windows as both our primary development and deployment platforms, I'd
suggest looking at Mercu
ge bug fixes and
> minor updates in between the "big work"
>
>
> > Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 09:42:40 -0700
> > Subject: Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3
> > From: currens.ch...@gmail.com
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apa
> geobmx...@hotmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Just wanted to check in - where do we feel like we stand? What is
> > left
> > > to
> > > > > do - is there anything I can help with specifically? I'll have some
&
; > > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Prescott Nasser > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Just wanted to check in - where do we feel like we stand? What is
> > left
> > > to
> > > > > do - is there anything I can help with s
before cutting release
> binaries.
>
> +1 to going now.
>
>
>
> > Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 19:31:45 +0300
> > Subject: Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3
> > From: ita...@code972.com
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.or
t; >
> > > > Just wanted to check in - where do we feel like we stand? What is
> left
> > to
> > > > do - is there anything I can help with specifically? I'll have some
> > spare
> > > > cycles this weekend. I want to really make a push to get this ready
&
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 19:31:45 +0300
> Subject: Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3
> From: ita...@code972.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> I agree
>
> What about the spatial stuff? you guys want to wait for it?
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Christopher Cu
t; > ~P
> >
> > ------------
> > > Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 20:38:10 +0300
> > > Subject: Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3
> > > From: ita...@code972.com
> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > >
> > >
e anything I can help with specifically? I'll have some spare
> cycles this weekend. I want to really make a push to get this ready to roll
> and not let it languish
>
> ~P
>
>
> > Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 20:38:10 +0300
> >
h
~P
> Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 20:38:10 +0300
> Subject: Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3
> From: ita...@code972.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> Go ahead with contrib and tests, ill resume with core and coordinate
> further later
> On Jul 27, 2012 7:04 PM, &
; >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Prescott Nasser <
> geobmx...@hotmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Alright, I'll hold off a bit.
> > > >
> > > > -
Christopher
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Prescott Nasser > >wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Alright, I'll hold off a bit.
> > >
> > >
> > > > Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 22:59:32 +0300
> > > > Subject: Re: Outstanding is
tt Nasser >wrote:
>
> >
> > Alright, I'll hold off a bit.
> >
> > ----------------
> > > Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 22:59:32 +0300
> > > Subject: Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3
> > > From: ita...@code972.com
> > > To: lucene-net-u...@lu
t; Alright, I'll hold off a bit.
>
>
> > Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 22:59:32 +0300
> > Subject: Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3
> > From: ita...@code972.com
> > To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
> > CC: lucene-net-dev@l
Alright, I'll hold off a bit.
> Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 22:59:32 +0300
> Subject: Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3
> From: ita...@code972.com
> To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
> CC: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> Act
.0 binaries. Great work everyone. ~P
> > Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 18:02:30 -0700
> > Subject: Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3
> > From: currens.ch...@gmail.com
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> >
> > I can set a different build target, but I can't se
n, 9 Jul 2012 18:02:30 -0700
> Subject: Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3
> From: currens.ch...@gmail.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> I can set a different build target, but I can't set the actual framework to
> 3.5 without doing it for all build configur
hen we had Debug and Release still, that seemed to
> work for me. But I feel like I'm missing something in your explaination.
> Good work though!
> > Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 17:51:36 -0700
> > Subject: Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3
> > From: currens.ch...@gmail.com
>
ing like this?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Christopher
>
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> >
> > Have at it.
> >
> > ------------
> > > Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 11:20:06 -0700
> > > Subject:
---
> > Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 11:20:06 -0700
> > Subject: Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3
> > From: currens.ch...@gmail.com
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> >
> > If it's alright with you, I'll work on it a little bit in that branch,
&g
just doing
> administrative work for the next two weeks though - I have a few things I
> have to take care of
>
>
> > Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:21:42 -0700
> > Subject: Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3
> > From: currens.ch...@gmail
if we've
>>> done
>>> enough for that so far, or if more is needed. I personally would like to
>>> see us make any API changes now, with the 3.0.3 release, but if we are
>>> comfortable with it, lets roll.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What are
ust "our release structure". I figured a little out this
weekend, splitting the XML and .dll files into separate directories. The
documentation you have on the wiki was actually pretty helpful.
Whatever more you can add would be great
~P
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:04:21 -0400
Sub
I could only ever get one test to fail - that has been fixed (just re-ran all
tests). The other tests I believe others have mentioned they are fixed.
~P
> Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 21:44:23 +0300
> Subject: Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3
>
enough for that so far, or if more is needed. I personally would like to
> see us make any API changes now, with the 3.0.3 release, but if we are
> comfortable with it, lets roll.
>
>
>
> What are your thoughts?
>
>
>
> ~P
>
>
>
>
>
>
houghts?
~P
> From: thowar...@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:34:37 -0700
> Subject: Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> Assuming we're talking about the packaging/filesystem structure in the
> releases, the struct
ttle out this
> weekend, splitting the XML and .dll files into separate directories. The
> documentation you have on the wiki was actually pretty helpful.
> Whatever more you can add would be great
>
> ~P
>
>> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:04:21 -0400
>> Subject: Re: Ou
an add would be great
~P
> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:04:21 -0400
> Subject: Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3
> From: mhern...@wickedsoftware.net
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > &g
> -- Task 470, a non-serious one, is listed only because it's mostly done and
> just need a few loose ends tied up. I'll hopefully have time to take care
> of that this weekend.
How many GetX/SetX are left? I did a quick search for 'public * Get*()' Most of
them looked to be actual methods - p
37 matches
Mail list logo
