Nicolas - how does your filter differ from the capabilities available
from the built-in QueryFilter? It seems at first glance to be nearly
the same thing.
Erik
On Nov 21, 2004, at 4:52 AM, Nicolas Maisonneuve wrote:
I developped a filter to seach in filtering the search with anterior
On Nov 20, 2004, at 5:49 PM, Vic wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
The Hits object already does some most-recently-used caching.
Is there any docs on this or should I look in source?
The caching is there to avoid disk access of the Lucene index for the
documents most likely to be accessed next.
I plan
yes ...it's the same kind of feature... (i didn't see this Filter !,
shame on me)
but my method is maybe faster because with the queryFilter an internal
search is launched and not with my method
nicolas
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 05:06:12 -0500, Erik Hatcher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicolas - how
hmm just a question ..
- in the normal indexSearcher method
there is a if (score 0.0F || filter.get(doc)) { doc in the hit}
- but in the queryFilter , there isn't a minimum score condition
normal or not ?
nicolas
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:34:00 +0100, Nicolas Maisonneuve
[EMAIL
QueryFilter keys off the hits from a previous search to light up the
bits for documents to pass the filter. The previous search hits all
have a score 0 already, so no need to be concerned with score there.
Erik
On Nov 21, 2004, at 8:49 AM, Nicolas Maisonneuve wrote:
hmm just a
On Nov 21, 2004, at 8:34 AM, Nicolas Maisonneuve wrote:
yes ...it's the same kind of feature... (i didn't see this Filter !,
shame on me)
but my method is maybe faster because with the queryFilter an internal
search is launched and not with my method
It'd be interesting for you to compare the
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Remember the rule of optimization: don't. And for experts only: don't
do it yet. :)
:-)
.V
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Compared to what?
- Original Message -
From: Miguel Angel
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 12:00 PM
Subject: disadvantages
What are disadvantages the Lucene??
--
Miguel Angel Angeles R.
Asesoria en Conectividad y Servidores
Telf. 97451277
On Nov 21, 2004, at 12:00 PM, Miguel Angel wrote:
What are disadvantages the Lucene??
The users of your system won't have time to get coffee when running
searches.
Erik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Hi Lucene list,
We have the need for analysed and 'not analysed/not tokenised' clauses
within one query. Imagine an unparsed query like:
+title:Hello World +path:Resources\Live\1
In the above example we would want the first clause to use
StandardAnalyser and the second to use an analyser which
You may singe your fingers if you touch the keyboard during indexing
Nader
Miguel Angel wrote:
What are disadvantages the Lucene??
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am pleased to announce that version 0.5 of LIMO, the Lucene Index Monitor,
has been released.
LIMO is a web application that allows you to browse your Lucene indexes
remotely. It is an ideal companion for Lucene applications that run in a
servlet container.
The 0.5 release adds some cool
Well that really depends on how big your index is and what they search for, now
doesn't it? ;)
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 11/21/2004 2:52 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: disadvantages
On Nov 21, 2004, at 12:00 PM, Miguel Angel
13 matches
Mail list logo
