On Dec 1, 2004, at 12:41 AM, Karthik N S wrote:
Is there any API in Lucene Which can retrieve all the searched
Values in
single fetch
into some sort of an 'Array' WITHOUT using this [ below ] Looping
process [ This would make
the Search and display more Faster ].
for (int i = 0;
hy george
is the C# lucene faster than java lucene ? (because it seems to me
that C# is faster than java, isn't it ?)
nicolas maisonneuve
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 21:08:30 -0500, George Aroush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
I am please to announce the availability of dotLucene 1.4.0
Hi
Erik
Apologies..
We create a ArrayList Object and Load all the Hit Values into them and
return
the same for Display purpose on a Servlet. On the servlet we track the
server side created ArrayList
for Required number of dispalys.
[ At any time we have to have all the hit
On Dec 1, 2004, at 7:37 AM, Karthik N S wrote:
We create a ArrayList Object and Load all the Hit Values into them
and
return
the same for Display purpose on a Servlet. On the servlet we track
the
server side created ArrayList
for Required number of dispalys.
[ At any time we have to have
Why does it seem to you that C# is faster than Java?
In any case, generally the bottleneck isn't the VM. It's the I/O to
the disks...
Scott
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all
progress depends on
On Dec 01, 2004, at 13:37, Karthik N S wrote:
We create a ArrayList Object and Load all the Hit Values into them
and
return
the same for Display purpose on a Servlet.
Talking of which...
It would be very handy if org.apache.lucene.search.Hits would implement
the java.util.List interface...
Hi,
I agree with Scott that Lucene is disk bound and I don't expect any drastic
performance different between Java/C# Lucene.
I am currently working on porting 1.4.3 to C# which I expect to have it
completed by next week. Once I have it done, I will do full performance
comparison.
Speaking of
On Dec 1, 2004, at 9:39 AM, George Aroush wrote:
I am currently working on porting 1.4.3 to C# which I expect to have it
completed by next week. Once I have it done, I will do full
performance
comparison.
Is the port a completely manual process for you? Could you describe
how you do the
This is very similar to what I do - I create a List of Maps from Hits
and its Documents. So I think this change may be handy, if doable (I
didn't look into changing the two Lucene classes, actually).
Otis
--- petite_abeille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 01, 2004, at 13:37, Karthik N S
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 10:27, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
This is very similar to what I do - I create a List of Maps from Hits
and its Documents. So I think this change may be handy, if doable (I
didn't look into changing the two Lucene classes, actually).
How do you avoid the problem Eric just
On Dec 1, 2004, at 11:54 AM, Venkatraju wrote:
This is actually 2 somewhat related questions:
- In regular multi term queries, does the default ranking function of
Lucene take into account proximity of the search terms? As far as I
know, proximity data is used only in phrase searches. Is this
On Dec 1, 2004, at 1:31 PM, Luke Francl wrote:
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 11:12, petite_abeille wrote:
Not really, except perhaps that a Lucene Document could theoretically
have multiple identical keys... not something that anyone would want
to
do though :o)
And why not? I use this to store closed
On Dec 01, 2004, at 20:06, Erik Hatcher wrote:
I also extensively use multiple fields of the same name.
Odd... on the other hand... perhaps this is une affaire de gout...
So does this rule out implementing the Map interface on Document?
Why? Nobody mentioned what value such a Map would hold... in
On Dec 1, 2004, at 2:21 PM, petite_abeille wrote:
On Dec 01, 2004, at 20:06, Erik Hatcher wrote:
I also extensively use multiple fields of the same name.
Odd... on the other hand... perhaps this is une affaire de gout...
There are some places I use this for convenience, and another where it
seems
On Dec 01, 2004, at 20:43, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Sure, I could put it all together as a space separated String and use
the WhitespaceAnalyzer, but why not do it this way? What other
suggestions do you have for doing this?
If this works for you, I don't see any problem with it.
In general, I
: Having Document implement Map sounds reasonable to me though. Any
: reasons not to do this?
:
: Not really, except perhaps that a Lucene Document could theoretically
: have multiple identical keys... not something that anyone would want to
Assuming you want all changes to be backwards
On Dec 01, 2004, at 21:14, Chris Hostetter wrote:
The real question in my mind is not how should we impliment 'get'
given
that we allow multiple values?, a better question is how should we
impliment 'put'?
Yes, retrofitting Document.add() in the Map interface would be a pain.
But this is not
Hi
i've got to index some SGML documents and need help or some expiriences with it.
Documents contain a number of different articles with the same structure
(TITLE, AUTHOR, DATA etc.), but i need to index each article as a different
document in my lucene index. Is there some reader for SGML? I
On Dec 1, 2004, at 2:59 PM, petite_abeille wrote:
On Dec 01, 2004, at 20:43, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Sure, I could put it all together as a space separated String and use
the WhitespaceAnalyzer, but why not do it this way? What other
suggestions do you have for doing this?
If this works for you, I
Hi Guys'
Apologies
I My Index, I have a Filed Type KeyWord ' FILE_NAME ' , It Captures UNIQUE
FOLDER NAME'S [ Starts with B1,B2,B3. ] During Indexing Process.
Please Can SomeBody Tell me How to Display ALL the FOLDER NAMES from the
Field 'FILE_NAME' With out any Search
20 matches
Mail list logo
