Here here. Edit away Monica.
I'm not a scholar, simply a humble lute player who relies on all sorts of
sources
(Grove being one
) for my learning and historical context for my
instrument.
Personally I'd prefer Wiki was edited by the scholars that know, rather
than
remain out of date or full
Don't we all... Mixed blessing indeed!
Eugene
-Original Message-
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of
Monica Hall
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 1:35 PM
To: A. J. Ness
Cc: Lutelist
Subject: [LUTE] Wikipedia
Dear Art
Yes - I just did. What
Wikipedia has strict rules against Original Research,
all information must be reliably sourced to scholarly 3rd parties.
So in the contest beteen Grove and Monica the former would still trump
the latter.
RT
- Original Message -
From: Monica Hall mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
To: A. J. Ness
Yet another good reason why conscientious teachers forbid their
students from using Wikipedia as a source. There is more, of course:
if your subject becomes 'sensitive' to the PC feelings of the
administrators or some nebulous and unidentified/unidentifiable
portion of the 'community', it is
] Re: Wikipedia
Yet another good reason why conscientious teachers forbid their
students from using Wikipedia as a source. There is more, of course:
if your subject becomes 'sensitive' to the PC feelings of the
administrators or some nebulous and unidentified/unidentifiable
portion of the 'community
What happens if you happen to be one of the scholarly third parties?
Monica
- Original Message -
From: Roman Turovsky r.turov...@gmail.com
To: lutenet lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 6:35 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Wikipedia
Wikipedia has strict rules against
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Wikipedia
Wikipedia has strict rules against Original Research,
all information must be reliably sourced to scholarly 3rd parties.
So in the contest beteen Grove and Monica the former would still trump
the latter.
RT
- Original Message -
From: Monica Hall mjlh
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 8:23 PM
Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Wikipedia
should be acceptable then.
RT
From: Monica Hall mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
What happens if you happen to be one of the scholarly third parties?
Monica
- Original Message -
From: Roman Turovsky r.turov...@gmail.com
@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 4:25 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Wikipedia
As far as Santiago de Murcia and the baroque guitar is concerned I am
generally considered to be one of them (although perhaps not by you).
Monica
- Original Message -
From: Roman Turovsky r.turov
, 2012 8:32 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Wikipedia
I know nothing about BG, and less about you, but if your data is
well-documented
to PUBLISHED (NOT self-published) material with page ##: is should be OK.
RT
- Original Message -
From: Monica Hall mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
To: Roman Turovsky
...@verizon.net
To: Monica Hall mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
Cc: Lutelist lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 8:32 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Wikipedia
I know nothing about BG, and less about you, but if your data is
well-documented
to PUBLISHED (NOT self-published) material with page
@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 8:32 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Wikipedia
I know nothing about BG, and less about you, but if your data is
well-documented
to PUBLISHED (NOT self-published) material with page ##: is should be OK.
RT
- Original Message - From: Monica Hall
12 matches
Mail list logo
