The Audacity 1.3.5 version I'm running has an effect called Bass Boost.
You set which frequency you want to boost and how many dB to boost by.
Very simple to use.
Many thanks Stephen (The other).
I have now located Audacity's Bass Boost in the Effects menu. I'll give
this a try next time I
considering copying their old
vinyl recordings to CD.
Best Wishes
Ron (UK)
-Original Message-
From: The Other [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 6:04 PM
To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] Re: H2 - Dm de Visee
Hello Rob,
Have you tried Audacity?
http
Greetings.
The most probable reason for the lack of bass on copying from a vinyl
might be the frequency design of vinyl players' heads. The
piezo-electric heads have their whole frequency region over in the
highs, but i assume it is not the case here, so you probably used a magnetic
head.
O, with Linux the same applies, you need to install LADSPA plugins, depending
on what you are running, in Debian apt-get install cmt tap-plugins .
(installs main ladspa plugins, of course there are more).
However, running Linux, personally i prefer Rezound to Audacity. For some
reason the
Deutsche Grammophon editors must still live in the Stone Age, 'cause they
are still on Samplitude
RT
- Original Message -
From: alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 7:36 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: H2 - Dm de Visee
O, with Linux
From: alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:06:12 -0500
Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deutsche Grammophon editors must still live in the Stone Age, 'cause they
are still on Samplitude
RT
I doubt they do.
I have it on a good authority.
However, if i noticed
OK - my final tests!
[1]http://www.songoftherose.co.uk/test2
A few from David Tayler (various 'anonimous' settings) and a few
samples from the free Glaceverb.
Time to revise what I am trying to do here. If the result is that a
4,000 dollar piece of kit sounds better than
I think you might also try some of the noisevault impulses with SIR
Budget recording editing options
Cheapest: SamplitudeSE/SIR/noisevault
bit more: Samplitude pro or master (comes with room simulator,
variverb and samples)
You can do all your editing, reverb, MP3s, etc in one program
I bought
From: David Tayler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll make up a budget workflow later this week for MP3s, CDs and DVD
audio,
but the short answer is just get Samplitude. Roman uses it and he has
more brain cells than me, for sure.
dt
That may be true, but they are a bit loose..
RT
To
As far as the Audacity platform, I'm all for free software, but the
Samplitude platform allows you, if you choose, to gradually upgrade
to professional software.
But you can download the trial version and try both for free.
As far as classical music goes--and early music in particular--there
Rob
This is the cost of new technology that allows us to replace
sound engineers, secretaries and so forth: less work for them,
and more tedious work for us; instead of playing or getting on with
our essential work.
But as most members on the list do now make their own recordings,
Which piece are you referring to, Anthony? David added reverb to my mp3
file of The Last Time I Came O'er The Moor, but hasn't yet done
anything at all to the wav file of the Prelude in Dm.
Rob
2008/11/21 Anthony Hind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rob
This is the cost of new
I'm really sorry if all this recording-reverb discussion is
boring some
of you - it usually bores me, so I apologise. Hopefully it will
only
last another couple of days, but I have learned a lot in the last
24
hours.
No, no- you are doing a
Oh, I was referring to the waiv file.
Anthony
Le 21 nov. 08 à 15:42, Rob MacKillop a écrit :
Which piece are you referring to, Anthony? David added reverb to my
mp3 file of The Last Time I Came O'er The Moor, but hasn't yet done
anything at all to the wav file of the Prelude in Dm.
Rob
Very good! David rocks. I can't hear any difference between his two
on my iMac. -Dan
Davis Taylor, our resident recording maestro, has put my mp3
through a pair of very expensive reverbs, the (wonderful) results of
which can be found at the bottom of the page:
I like Davis Taylor, but I prefer David Tayler
What a DIVA!!!
The reverbs on the first run are halo reverbs, they are meant to be
slightly below the threshold of audibility, so that, paradoxically,
they don't sound like reverb.
This is especially true if you don't have the original, and
Yes,that reverb is smashing !
--
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
Yes,that reverb is smashing !
There is one (Lexicon 480) on ebay for a mere 4,000 dollars. At that
price I would expect it to play the instrument for me as well...
[1]http://tinyurl.com/58wfn8
Rob
--
References
1. http://tinyurl.com/58wfn8
To get on or off this
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Rob MacKillop
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm really sorry if all this recording-reverb discussion is boring some
of you - it usually bores me, so I apologise.
Remember when I bored the list to death with my recording experiments?
Your collected patience helped
The Lexicon 90 or 91 is fine if you want a hardware box.
It isn't worth buying one unless you are producing a lot of CDs,
better to buy the SIR plugin or the cheapest version of Samplitude
that has the room simulator built in.
I'll make up a budget workflow later this week for MP3s, CDs and DVD
20 matches
Mail list logo
